pdlester_20070705_039.jpg
A place to gather my thoughts.

July 4th evening: I was sitting in my backyard. The weather was pleasant. There was a slight breeze wafting through the trees. The air smelled of summer … you know, the scent of meat cooking on the grill. :-) Even though it wasn’t quite dark yet, there were the sounds of people lighting firecrackers, kids having fun, the sound of music drifting through the air, and laughter of both adults and kids having a nice, carefree day.

As soon as it became night, the fireworks began in earnest. The view from my backyard was less than spectacular, but the flares, bottle rockets, bursts, etc. were visible. Some of them even crested the tops of the trees. Mind you, these were consumer grade fireworks, which don’t go as high as those of professional grade. Anyway, I sat there and watched them stream through the air and permeate the air with the sulfurous and tangy smell of spent gunpowder. After a while, it became nearly overwhelming as I was downwind from most of the activity.

The previous day, I had told Tony, my son, that we would go to South Carolina, which is about 20 miles away, to get some fireworks. You can’t get any good ones here, nothing but sparklers. However, on the morning of the 4th, I decided to investigate and find out why that was. I found out that any firework that flies, spins, explodes, or moves under its own power is illegal to use in North Carolina; however, SC has no such laws, which is why there are numerous state line booths. People cross the line to get the good stuff.

I had to tell Tony that I was not going to go to SC to purchase fireworks to shoot here. He was disappointed, but got over it soon. We went to the store and bought some fireworks approved for use in NC. Boring! Next year, I think that we’ll get him and some friends, go to SC, buy a bunch of fireworks, shoot them off in SC, and return home. All legal.

After I told him that we weren’t going to go, I sat and explained that even though ‘everybody else is doing it’ it doesn’t make it legal, or for that matter, right. He understood and even shared a story with me that kind of warmed my heart and gave me confirmation that I was headed in the right direction:

He said that one of the ladies at school, who works in the lunch room, said that they could sign up for ‘free’ lunches this summer. He asked how. She said that all that we had to do was fill out the paper, lie about our income (“everybody does it and we don’t check or require proof”), and like that, we get ‘free’ lunch. He told me that he told her that there is no way that my dad would do that. No way!

That’s step one! He knows that I wouldn’t perform a dishonest act. Step 2 is for him to say: “No thanks. That’s dishonest. I don’t want to participate.”.

Later in the evening, our neighbor was talking to me and asked why I didn’t go to SC and get the fireworks. I told him about the law and he said: “Man! They don’t even enforce that law. Next year, you should do it up right!”. I told him that as long as the law was still a law, that I would follow it.

Over the years, we’ve had numerous chances to cheat. Some of the competitive sports teams tend to make a living at this providing fake birth certificates, players who are older and playing under a younger person’s name, etc. Lying just seems to be no big deal anymore, just as long as it benefits you and you can ‘get over’ on the system.

I would have loved to have some cool fireworks, but the eyes of my son were upon me. How could I have selectively ignored one law and then tell him, later, that the rules apply to everyone. I couldn’t.

I’d be very much interested to hear your story or your take on this, even if it is a very long comment! I like to read!!!

About the picture: It’s only relationship to the post is that I was looking at it while thinking about what to say. This is a vase with some flowers that I bought for my wife. The light was so beautiful as well as the curvature of the glass that I had to grab my 80-200 f/2.8 and shoot with it for a while. This was the best of the shots that I got.

 

pdlester_20061123_110.jpg

Miksang literally means ‘Good eye’. I found a site dealing with Miksang photography, which is a style of photography based on a particular facet of Buddhist meditation. After reading about it a bit, it all boils down to what I call ‘shooting in the gap’. To me this is shooting when you are totally in the moment. Your mind is clear of all chatter. You are one with the Universe. You are fully present. On occasion, I can get there, and when I do, my photographs seem to take on a new meaning.
pdlester_20061029_013.jpg
In this ‘gap’, which is the gap between the noise, the pictures come to me. I have no expectation. I have no desire of the outcome. I am simply seeing. Most of the time, this happens around my house in the morning or evening when no one is around and I’m just walking around the house and looking … simply looking. Sometimes it happens when I’m getting dressed for work, but it only happens when my mind is still.
pdlester_20061123_105.jpg
The other day, I tried to go out to shoot to calm down. I had some things on my mind that were bothering me, so I figured that I’d forget about it by shooting. It doesn’t work that way for me. If I shoot while upset, my pictures show it. They are horrible. If I go in a peaceful state of mind, then my pictures show that.

I’m not always successful in summoning this meditative state, but it comes more easily now. I truly do not know if this offers better photography, but at least, for me, it offers more meaningful photography. Here‘s a Quicktime movie, if you are interested.

 

pdlester_20061225_695.jpg
Well, folks, it’s the 4th of July here in the US. We are celebrating our 231st year of independence from England! Yep, we’re pretty young. On this date in 1776, we declared independence from England by signing the Declaration of Independence.

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. …

pdlester_20061225_680.jpg

So, Hobbs says have a great and safe 4th, if you are in the US, otherwise have a great day! He also says, go for a run on the beach and chase a seagull or two, it’s fun!

I’ll be back tomorrow with more thoughts, and perhaps a few firework pictures! :-)

 

pdlester_20070323_063.jpg
Who are the so-called Masters of Photography? What makes a photographer a master?

So, were the masters of photography really better, or was it that they were first? I write the post not to invoke your ire, but it’s just a question that crosses my mind from time to time. Were they really better? Considering that at the time that most of the photographs were rendered, not many people had cameras. There were but a handful of photographers who had the money, skill, and desire to deal with an 8×10 view camera, such as was wielded by Ansel Adams. Later, some of the other masters worked for magazines or newspapers and were sent to locations that were brimming with the news of the day.

Please don’t get me wrong. I think that Ansel Adams photographs are wonderful and he, without a doubt, was a master at understanding film and development, light and shadow. He was a true craftsman. Unparalleled. I guess that my point is, were his subjects any better than those being selected today? He was first, so those who followed along and produced, perhaps as good, if not better photographs, show up a day late and a dollar short.

In looking at the work of other so-called masters, I don’t see the same craftsmanship as in Ansel Adams. I mean, click on the link above and compare the work of Ansel Adams vs. Robert Adams, or even Ansel Adams vs. Robert Mapplethrope (two thumbs down!). There is no comparison, IMHO. Further to the point, I’ve seen many photographers in the various blogs who I think surpass some of the so-called masters.
pdlester_20070517_009.jpg

I’m not one to put photographers, or anyone else for that matter, on a pedestal. I must say that I am impressed with the work of AA. I love Henri Cartier Bresson, but I’ve seen some street photography that I think is just as good, if not better than his. Edward Weston’s peppers and shells were great studies of shape, texture, and form. I loved them.

With the exception of a few photographers, I think that it was just because they were first, or that they were outlandish/pioneering, not true masters.

Anyway, food for thought …

 

pdlester_20070626_010.jpg

None of us knows what the next change is going to be, what unexpected opportunity is just around the corner, waiting a few months or a few years to change all the tenor of our lives. – Kathleen Norris

Change is inevitable. It is but a matter of time, sometimes a short time, sometimes a long one, but change will come. Looking back on photography, it has changed a lot from a technological perspective. What started as a Daguerreotype, around 1839, has now become digital. Who knows what the next 168 years will bring.

During the early years, cameras were expensive, difficult to operate, and were generally only in the hands of the professional. Years later, 35mm cameras, rangefinders, and even instant film (Polaroid) hit the scene. Photography had come to the masses; however, to use a camera, you still had to know something about exposure, light balance, film, etc. The professional photographer still had a technological advantage over the every day citizenry. Next up, 1 hour photo labs, disposable cameras, disk cameras, etc. Now more and more, consumers had the power to create their own pictures, but still, the professional reigned over weddings and other special events.

Fast forward to today. The digital camera is nearly as ubiquitous as the cell phone or the iPod. Everyone has one. Now, the camera has a computer on-board and can figure out most lighting situations decently and there are special effects, etc. Also, there’s no waiting! Perfect for the “Microwave generation”. There’s none of that nasty delayed gratification.

The change to digital has hit the professional photographers hard. No longer are people willing to spend thousands and thousands of dollars on weddings. They just simply get their cousin, who has a nice camera, to take the pictures. Budgets for photographers are getting smaller and smaller because: “Anyone can do it”. There are still people shooting film, but the types of film available are dwindling.

As most anyone can take a picture, whether it has meaning or value is subjective, and a lot of people do just that. No longer is competition only among photographers who have spent years perfecting their craft. Everyone who can afford a $200 digital camera can be in the race, whether they know anything about photography at all is seemingly immaterial.

pdlester_20070519_077.jpg

I was talking to my friend, Richard, on the phone the other day. He was telling me about his family reunion that he attended and lamenting about the lack of quality and professionalism that a fellow photographer showed. Richard watched this guy set up to take a group shot and noticed that the man had the group’s back to the sun. Richard realized that lens flare was going to become a problem, so he suggested that the man move the group to a location some 25 feet or so at a right angle to where they were. This area was shaded and would allow a picture without lens flare. The photographer declined saying something to the effect: “I’ve already metered the light”.

Richard went on to say that later, when the guy came back with the pictures, they were terrible. Each print had so much lens flare that it obscured some of the faces, yet, this guy wanted $10 for each 8×10.

The market has changed. We, as photographers, have to figure out ways to continue to compete. After all, after Al Gore invented The Internet (Sure, Al! Sure!), the post office lost revenue. E-mail became the big thing, online bill pay, etc. They had to learn, and are still learning, how to compete.

For me, I figure teaching is the way to go. There are millions upon millions of people who have these shiny new toys and would like to know how to use them. I figure, why not, for a $100 and a few hours on the weekend, I’ll be happy to teach them! :-)

Things change. Time marches on whether we like it or not.

 

img016.jpg
Dante, my nephew circa 1982

In less than 2 weeks, I will return to Akron in celebration of my aunt Francis’ 80th birthday. Having found these old negatives, I’m looking forward to returning and filling in a few ‘blanks’ in my photographic archives. I hope to go an capture a picture of all three of my schools:

McEbright Elementary
Goodrich Middle School (Formally, Goodrich Junior High)
Central-Hower High School (Now closed)

Also, as time allows, I want to visit my old house, grab a picture there, and head off to perhaps take some picture elsewhere in the city.

It’s really hard to believe that I’ve been gone from Akron for 25 years. I don’t really miss it and I’m happy with my life in the south. I prefer he milder winters. :-)
img022.jpg
The top picture is of Dante, my brother Charles’ son. Dante is now about 30, has his own landscaping business, and is doing well. He still lives in Akron. I’m going to print out this picture and take it to him. He doesn’t know that I have it, so it should be a big surprise.

The other picture is a shot from one of the historic places that I liked to visit, Stan Hywet Hall and Gardens:

Contrary to popular belief, this impressive historic house museum did not get its name from a person or family. Stan Hywet (pronounced Hee-wit), means “Stone Quarry” in Olde English. At one time, this estate contained a sandstone quarry (which is now the site of the naturalistic lagoons). In 1912, F.A. Seiberling, co-founder of Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, and his family began construction of the Manor House, which hosted such guests as President Taft, Helen Keller and the Von Trapp family. Today the estate is comprised of 70 remaining acres of beautifully landscaped grounds that harmoniously combine structural design with natural surroundings. One of the ground’s most popular attractions is the peaceful walled English Garden that was created by renowned landscape architect Ellen Biddle Shipman.

I didn’t photograph here much in the summer because they charged an admission fee. In the winter, it was free! :-) Hey, I was a poor college student at the time. It was all about the budget!

I must say, I did a good job at developing my negatives! Here they are, 25 years later, and they are still clean, clear, and ready to use! I didn’t know that I had processed them to archival quality! :-)

© 2011 Paul Lester Photo Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Bad Behavior has blocked 229 access attempts in the last 7 days.