I can’t recall every putting a video up, but this one was certainly worth sharing. You may have see it, but it’s the first time that I’ve seen it and it is chilling. It also points out the seriousness of being a parent. Want it or not, our children mimic us.

One of the best things that I’ve ever done in front of Tony was to help a blind man cross some train tracks to get to his bus. The 3 of us, my wife, Tony, and I had come from downtown. Each day, my wife and I rode the train from home to work in downtown Dallas and Tony stayed at the YMCA. On this particular day, on the way home, there was a blind man riding who got off at the same stop. Many people just walked on by as he attempted to make his way down the walkway. To get to the bus, which would take him home, he had to cross the train tracks, walk down a set of stairs, and go to the bus terminal. Not an easy task, to be sure, especially being blind. At first, I was hesitant, I didn’t want to assume that he couldn’t do it. I’d been taught to be very politically correct, but then overcame my fear, of ‘insulting’ him. I asked, simply, if I could help him. He happily agreed and was very thankful. We walked him to the terminal, made sure that he was in the right place for his bus, and then went our way. I would see him from time to time in downtown, but never saw him again on the train.

At that time, I didn’t realize how much of a defining moment that had been for Tony. Even though this happened in 2000, when Tony was 8, he still speaks of it today. He talked about it the other day when I told him that I saw an accident happen. He asked if I stopped and offered help or if I called the police. I told him that was about to stop, but that there were already 2 people on the scene, one calling the police, the other offering help, so I continued on my way. He was happy that I had thought to stop, then he repeated the story about the blind man and who cool that was.

On a smaller note, he saw a spider crawling on the couch, went got a piece of paper, scooped him up, and took him outside to release it rather than kill it. I was impressed, told him so, and thanked him for doing that. :-)

Even though they defy you sometimes, they are always watching, both the positive and negative reactions that you have. True, they have their own personalities, but they look to us as guides. My goal is to be in that positive role model mode, but I don’t always succeed.

Anyway, it’s a fantastic commercial. For my friends who may be locked down behind a firewall, like my friends at Wachovia, here is the link to the video so that you can check it out when you break out of prison! :-)

If you’d care to share your role model stories, I’d love to hear them.

Internet pests

 Personal  Comments Off
Oct 232007
 

pdlester_20060804_073.jpg

Some people have nothing better to do. There’s been this one person who seems to pop in and drop nonsense messages, from time to time. The latest IP address is: 201.208.129.38, I looked it up on IP Whois:

OrgName: Latin American and Caribbean IP address Regional Registry
OrgID: LACNIC
Address: Rambla Republica de Mexico 6125
City: Montevideo
StateProv:
PostalCode: 11400
Country: UY

I have no idea who this person is but it is always from the same area, sometimes slightly different, but annoying nonetheless. Based on the content, topic, and writing style, I assume that it’s the same person. He/she never has any good content to offer, but insists on posting. Each time I flag it as spam, so the same IP address cannot be used, but every once in a while they make it through again, presumably when they get a new IP address assigned to their router. Oh well, I guess that it’s just part of being in cyberspace.

The message is usually such nonsense as this:

i’ll take life’s gifts as they come. perhaps our time will come after that. taka care kid, this has nothing to do with money btw, it has always just been about the soul and the heart

The style is usually the same. Have any of you been bothered by this same person? Any other ideas for blocking these messages? I don’t want to block a range of IP address because there may actually be some legitimate posters.

Actually, I’ve probably given this person their 1.5 minutes of fame. I’ll just have to be vigilant in keeping an eye on the posts and continuing to delete/mark as SPAM. One things is for sure, they don’t catch a clue easily.

So, whoever you are, catch a clue and be gone. Write your own blog if you want to. One side note: Since I’ve added keywords to ‘most’ of my pictures, it sure is easy to find a picture to match the topic if I need one. Here, I just selected ‘insect’ and found an appropriate one in no time!

 

pdlester_20071021_7205.jpg
Goldenrod: Click image for more

Sunday morning I went out to the other side of the neighborhood, which is still under construction. Soon, within 6 months – 12 months, this area that I’m shooting will be private property. The backyard of someone’s $500,000+ home will face this view. Also, any possibility of getting the same types of shots will be close to nil because of the houses blocking the sunrise. Hey, but things change. In the mean time, I can enjoy them and share them with my friends.

Thinking about change, had this area not been cleared for building houses, I would have not be able to get these shots. The sun would not have been able to penetrate this deeply into the woods and all of it would have been private property up to the main road, some 1/2 mile to the east. It’s all a matter of perspective. Soon, it will once again be private property but on a much smaller scale. This too, will present some advantages/disadvantages … good news, bad news, who knows. Perhaps there will be some opportunities to catch a sunrise on a nice big McMansion with colorful leaves in the background. Who knows.

It reminds me of a Chinese proverb or story that I read earlier this year and that has stuck with me. It’s a great way, in my view, to deal with life’s ups and downs. Good/bad being of relative value to the recipient and all events are just that, events, having no inherent good or bad value. It’s just how we judge them.

“Long ago, there was a farmer who lived in China. This was a poor farmer who had but one horse. He used his horse to plow the fields so that he could make a living. One day, the horse ran away. “Oh no!” cried the neighbors, “That is terrible!”. The old farmer shrugged and said: “Good news, bad news – who knows”.

Several days later, the farmer’s horse returned to the farm with several wild horses following behind. The farmer and his son managed to capture the horses, all of them of great beauty. “Oh, how wonderful!” cried the neighbors. Once again, the farmer simply shrugged and said: “Good news, bad news – who knows”.

The next day, the farmer’s twenty-year-old-son managed to capture one of the wild horses, but while attempting to break the steed, was thrown and his leg badly broken. The neighbors rushed over, peering at the young man in bed, “Oh, this is awful news!” they cried. The farmer shrugged, “Good news, bad news, who knows?”

A few weeks later, the Chinese army came by, conscripting all the area’s young men for war raging in the south. They couldn’t take the young man with the broken leg… “

 

pdlester_20071020_7191.jpg
Yesterday evening’s half moon

For some reason, I’ve always been fascinated with the moon. Today, that fascination continues. Whenever I look up into the sky and see the moon, it captures my attention. Sometimes for long stretches of time, other times for short ones, but it always fascinates and enchants. I can’t explain why, but neither do I try.
pdlester_20061108_005.jpg
3/4 of the way there
Perhaps it goes back to by days when I wanted to visit the moon, which I would still do if given the opportunity.
pdlester_20070827_200.jpg
A full moon, California style: Carmel, CA 2007/08/27

I have only 64 images of the moon in my library and I don’t have any quarter moons … hmmm, I’ll have to fix that! I don’t have any of the huge looking moons that appear every once and a while, either. I’d love to get a shot of one of those, but when I see them, I usually am driving down the highway and don’t have my tripod with me. One day it will happen!

Scientists explain that this huge moon is merely a trick that our brain plays on us and that photographers who have attempted to take this picture are frequently disappointed at the results because the photograph portrays reality without the brains exaggeration. Interesting. I’d like to try it for myself. This is still a phenomenon that is still being studied. Well, even though I may not understand it, that doesn’t diminish it’s beauty. Perhaps understanding ‘how it works’ would eliminate the mystery and enjoyment. We needn’t understand everything.

And finally, a closer look:
pdlester_20060906_003.jpg

 

pdlester_20071018_0008.jpg
Exotic locations – My neighborhood park’s parking lot
Before I start this, I’d like to give you my definition of happiness as compared to the dictionary’s definition:

Paul: Being content or satisfied with what you have at this very moment. Period.

Dictionary.com:
1. delighted, pleased, or glad, as over a particular thing: to be happy to see a person.
2. characterized by or indicative of pleasure, contentment, or joy: a happy mood; a happy frame of mind.
3. favored by fortune; fortunate or lucky: a happy, fruitful land.

Happiness is ours to have at any time of the day or night. We don’t need another person to experience it, a television, radio, book, or camera. We can be happy with what we have weather we millions of dollars, or we are poor living in a hovel. It is a state of mind, not affected by the outside. I’m not there yet, but I am on the journey and am enjoying it. Sometimes, honestly, it’s scary. It’s scary because it is so different. It’s casting off lines (beliefs) that I have been given. It’s different from what society has told me. It’s different from what my parents told me. It’s different.

When we were children, we were given rules and regulations on the ‘right’ way to live. As adults some of us awaken and realize that true happiness is within us and that no one can provide it, no matter how much we want them to. Not children, not spouses, no one. I see, as a parent, my role is to offer guidance, not control. I don’t own my children, I am nothing more than a guide. I try not impress upon them my value or belief system. Should they choose to believe as I believe, that is their choice.

I want, seemingly more than anything else, for my children to be happy, but I cannot do this for them. I want for them to choose careers where they have passion, regardless of what society thinks or how much money they will make. I want for them to wake up to each day and enjoy every single moment of it. I want for them to be content with whatever they have right now. I would like for them to be happy.
pdlester_20071019_7186.jpg
“Weeds” in the backyard!

Regarding my photography, I am content. I try not to measure myself and label it as good or bad. I just enjoy it. It’s my expression. Not everyone may like it. Not everyone may find my writing enjoyable, provocative, or enlightening. I just do these things because they are part of my journey … destination unknown. I’m happy.

 

pdlester_20071013_290.jpg
Mills River Valley Overlook – Still sleeping

Crowdsourcing is a neologism for the act of taking a job traditionally performed by an employee or contractor, and outsourcing it to an undefined, generally large group of people, in the form of an open call. For example, the public may be invited to develop a new technology, carry out a design task, refine an algorithm or help analyze large amounts of data.

I love how new words just pop up here and there. I’ve seen this word so many times this week as a surfed the Internet that it seemed appropriate to write blog entry about it.

Back in my youthful days I thought that it would be cool to have a number of images in the Getty database, but then I learned of the daunting fact that most professional photographers that have images listed with Getty have 10′s of thousands of images with Getty and that, for the most part, 20% of the photographers earn about 80% of the money. Also, Getty works hard to keep the top professionals producing for them. It helps to have a very large portfolio of very high quality images and to have made a name for yourself if you want to get with Getty.

On the same side of town is a company that tried to get into photo stock business, Corbis, owned by one Mr. Bill Gates who seems to try to take over nearly everything. Corbis has never made a profit according to a Forbes magazine article that I read. It’s a tough business.

Times, they are a changing! Enter Crowdsourcing, more specifically, microstock agencies who’s model is based on quantity rather than quality. As Bill Gates said, we are in a business dealing with $200 bears. Why would anyone want to purchase a picture of a bear for $200 when they can get the same bear for $2?

Now, with the ubiquitousness of digital cameras and increasing skill in Photoshop, anyone can submit a really nice photograph to a microstock agency and perhaps earn a little money. This is really cutting into the bottom line of sites like Getty who are now going to try to compete on search technology, allowing their clients to be able to search on things such as shape, room for text, multiple languages, hierarchical keywords, fuzzy logic, etc.
pdlester_20071013_404.jpg
Even you can make money shooting landscapes!

Getty are trying to compete with cheaper licenses as well, but some photographers are not happy about it as it will cut deeply into their profits; however, this is just market evolution, it’s either compete or ‘defeat’. As the Internet continues to grow and become more important in everyday life, print advertising, which used to highly dependent on companies like Getty, need to reduce costs, so they seem to be going to microstock when they can.

I took a short trip over to Shutterstock.com where you get a grand total of $0.25 (25 cents) per download for your images. Certainly, you’ll not get rich at this rate, but if you have a lot of popular photographs, you could make a little bit of money. They claim that a lot of their photographers earn $500/month, which is 2,000 downloads/month. Note, these are downloads, not usages. Clients pay them $199/month for the ability to download 25 images/day, and up to 750/month.

This reminds me of the IT world, in which I currently work. Here, onshore, we are responsible for delivering complete designs, and I mean very complete, and then the assembly is down offshore, allegedly saving money. With the microstock, you are responsible for uploads, keywording, etc.

pdlester_20071013_513.jpg
Well. Jumping isn’t allowed, but no one said anything about not using a kayak!

It’s all about making a profit and keeping the system growing; however, no system can grow forever, soon it will collapse upon itself. It’s always interesting to see what’s next on the horizon in the never ending saga of growth. Heck, I even see photographers creating their own stock sections on their websites. At least if someone searches, they are sure to find your work!

Anyone here participate in Micro Stock agencies?

 

pdlester_20071014_752.jpg
The end product

During our get-together, there was much talk about split neutral density filters and it seemed as if most people had them. I again, being the simpleton of the bunch, had none. :-) I go pretty naked, having only one polarizer which, for the most part, sits unused. Plus, especially during sunrise and sunset, I don’t like to mess around with a lot of equipment. Things change to fast.
compare.jpg
What I started with. 5 stops apart
I’ve thought, from time to time, of getting some but never have. I’ve learned to bracket and blend. This keeps me from having to use split ND filters. It also has the advantage, I found out through someone else’s experience, of allowing me to use my lens shade. There were a couple of people who were getting lots of glare because while using their filters, they couldn’t use the lens shade. There is a way around it, of course, by placing your hand in a strategic location to place shade upon the lens.

Another advantage of using the Photoshop method is that I have the choice of where I start the fade. With split ND, I get to make the choice on the spot and there is no going back. It is where it is.

This technique comes in very handy when you have a wide range of values that you are trying to capture. For example, in this picture, there was nearly a 5 stop difference between the foreground and the sky. That’s a bit much to ask of a sensor. I believe that it is on the outer fringes of possibility or perhaps out of range all together. It’s better not to take a chance!

Anyway, either way works, but I just prefer to do it after the fact. What about you?

Addendum: After I wrote this, I happened to go to Craig Tanner’s site later in the evening. He has a beautiful shot that he took from a seaplane using a 3 stop split ND filter. In this case, I could not do what he did without a filter. Things were in motion and I wouldn’t be able to get off a few shots from the same position. Interesting. I never said that they weren’t useful; I had just never needed one. :-)

Bad Behavior has blocked 409 access attempts in the last 7 days.