pdlester_20080121_9494.jpg

For the most part I’ve been printing black and white prints and really like what I see from both of my printers. For 8.5 x 11, or smaller, I use the HP 7760. For larger prints, the Epson 3800. The HP does not have such things as printer profiles, etc. Instead, it has a built-in spectrometer that seems to get the colors very, very close to what I see on the screen!

The Epson, it would seem, needs a bit more interaction. Perhaps this is the nature of so called, professional printers. I experimented a bit with the Advanced Black & White mode, or ABW, on the Epson and tweaked things until I got what I wanted. It didn’t take long. Now, I’m really pleased with the output. The color, however, is a different beast. I’ve blown many sheets of paper on soft-proofing. Mind you, I profile my monitor about once per week using Spyder 2 Express. But, the results, that I get are not close to what I want. The prints seem to come out of the printer at about 2/3 to 1 stop underexposed, if they look right on the screen. They look rather dark, loosing some shadow detail, etc.

Taking Scott Kelby’s advice from his CS2 book for digital photographers, I tried soft-proofing and the setting suggested, which include selecting the No Color Control radio button. I get prints that are too dark. This seems to be the same experience that Laurie, from Capture This, got when she tried soft-proofing. We were sharing e-mails earlier on and she said:

With the soft proofing I do uncheck that box and it still makes it look really super washed out and if I adjust it to look “right” then it prints way to dark, darker than when I don’t soft proof. So my files already tended toward dark and soft proofing makes them artificially lighter so they would print even darker. It was quite a frustration for me. But I use Lightroom now which doesn’t have the soft proofing so it doesn’t really matter anymore. It’s become more of a beast I want to conquer rather than a tool that I want to use.

I’m rapidly approaching this same level of frustration. It would seem that it shouldn’t be this difficult to get the type of print that I want. Perhaps it’s a matter of learning curve, perhaps I haven’t paid my dues, or perhaps I got to use to the HP’s hassle-free way of printing. One thing that Laurie did warn me about was that I would probably go through a lot of consumables before I got it right. It looks like she’s probably right! Sigh …

I am, however, learning a lot. Printing is highly subjective and print output is better to be evaluated where the print will be viewed. There is a marked difference in perceived print color and contrast depending on major source of lighting within a room. Also, the color of the wall on which it will be hung, makes quite a difference.

If I view a print in my office, which is fairly dim, the print doesn’t look very good straight out of the printer; however, if I view it in the family room, with it’s 8 large windows, all facing south, the print takes on a very different characteristic. It looks more colorful, especially in the blue range, and is quite satisfactory. It also appears to have have a greater amount of contrast. Looking at the print in that very same room after about 4:00 PM, when the light has gotten warmer because of the impending sunset, the print looses some of it’s blueness, which may or may not be important, depending on the print.

There’s so much to learn. I think that I’d like to take a master printing class and see the potential of some of my photographs in the hands of someone who really knows how to bring out the best in the print. I’d like to learn. I don’t know what’s possible right now, I suppose.

In case any of you don’t know what PITA is, it’s Pain In The A$$! :-)

 

pdlester_20080121_9466.jpg

Close to two years ago when I bought my D2x, I was a bit impatient. Instead of buying it from my usual place of business, B&H Photo, I bought from somewhere else. That somewhere else was a place called B&Y Distributors. A place from where I would never again purchase anything. You’ve got to read the fine print. :-)

At that time, B&H was closed for some holiday, or another, which is not an unusual thing! Anyway, I didn’t want to wait the extra couple of days and, I thought, this place had a ‘kit’ that had an 18-70mm lens, a 70-300mm lens for a $200 less than the price of the body alone at B&H.

I read the fine print, or so I thought. They said that it had a USA warranty and when I called, they confirmed that it did have a USA warranty. What they didn’t say was that this was a gray market camera and the USA warranty was a 3rd party warranty from Repair Tech, not Nikon. Now, I don’t have anything at all against gray market cameras. I’ve bought them before, but I’d like to plainly stated, up front, that that is what is happening.

Before placing my order, I had to ‘call’ to confirm. You got it! They put on the high pressure sales tactics trying to get me to buy, for example, a $30 digital concepts battery for $299, which they claimed to be better than the Nikon battery. I said no way and finally bought the battery for $30, just to get the guy off of the phone. The up-sell pressure is intense. They are trying to pawn off all kinds of Digital Concepts crap at 5 – 10x regular price. This is how they make their profits.

After getting my ‘kit’, I discovered the 3rd party warranty was not the USA warranty that they had implied, but a 3rd party warranty. Heck, they even sent a warranty for ‘under $3000′ value. After a call, they recognized the mistake and sent out the correct one. Fortunately, the camera was covered under my Capital One credit card’s insurance, too for 2 years past the manufacturers warranty.

At any rate, I didn’t enjoy the sales pressure nor did I like the shady dealings. Needless to say, I would never buy from them again. I was, however, very lucky in that I got a quality camera and paid less than full price, but next time, or should I say, this time, I’ll pay full price.

This topic popped up in my mind as I sit here in my third week waiting for my Nikon D3 to ship. I’ve ordered it from Ritz, a reputable seller. Unfortunately, B&H is strictly first come, first served. If I’m lucky to find it online, I’ll order it from there and cancel my order with Ritz. I could get one right now because I’ve seen some of them being scalped on eBay for 10 – 50% over full retail. I’ve also seen the ‘too good to be true prices’. I think that I’ll just wait.

Good things come to those who wait.

 

pdlester_20080121_9458.jpg

I know, it’s a little bit late, just a little, to be talking about 2007 stuff; however, I just thought about this. There are two items in my possession that I bought in 2007 that I’m really glad that I bought:

On the top of the list is my Manfrotto, 458B Neotec Tripod – With this set of legs, getting low shots and then getting the high shots is a piece of cake. Letting the legs down requires only a push of a button; extending them back out, just a pull on the legs. Fantastic. No longer do I need to unscrew or unlock legs. The tripod is not very heavy duty, but works well for how I use it. I would imagine that adding a camera bag, or some type of weight to the center post would make it more stable, but I’ve never been disappointed with the shots that I get from it, and I use it a lot. Also, I removed the center post extension so that I could get very low to the ground.

Second on the list is the Singh-Ray Vari-ND filter. Yes, it’s a bit pricey, weighing in at $390 for the wide-angle version, but well worth the investment. I’m glad that I bought it! I like to shoot water as well as do a bit of panning while shooting sports, or perhaps cars, just for fun. This makes it so easy. Here, with ISO 200, and perhaps f/8, 30 second exposures are easy to do! :-) The potential is endless. I’ve just begun to scratch the surface. The filter allows you to get that beautiful blur to the water without resulting to using f/22, when you really don’t want to, or perhaps when it’s too bright outside to get the shot no matter what you do.

 

pdlester_20080119_9381.jpg

In case some of you have read it about on Paul Butzi’s site, I’ll repeat it here. SoFoBoMo stands for Solo Photo Book Month. You can read on his site about the full details.

Anyway, it’s just a challenge, not a contest, to put together a photography book in 31 days, containing 35 photographs and optional associated text. The format will be PDF. This means that all shooting, writing, and editing must be done within a 31 day window. There are no judges, nor are there any policeman to watch to make sure that you did it during that time frame. It’s on the honor system.

The idea started with National Novel Writing Month, or NaNoWriMo, where authors attempted to write a 50,000 word novel in 30 days, and National Solo Album Month, where musicians attempt to write an entire album during the month of November, each year.

I love this quote from the NaSoAlMo website:

NaSoAlMo favors enthusiasm and perseverance rather than perfectionism. It’s meant to encourage musicians and would-be songwriters to silence their internal critic for thirty days in order to inspire and maximize productivity. The albums are likely to be hastily written, off-time, and out of tune; the main objective is to just do it.

So, here’s your chance to silence that inner critic that is always telling you that you can’t do something, or that you’re not good enough. To heck with it! You can sign up at Paul’s website. It’s nothing official and he won’t come and hunt you down if you don’t produce … at least I don’t think so.

He’s running what he calls a fuzzy month to help accommodate people’s schedules. Here’s the gist:

Because we’re just getting started, we’re doing a fuzzy month. You should pick a 31 day period that starts no earlier than April 1, 2008, and ends no later than May 31, 2008. In other words, if you start on April 1, your month ends on May 1. If you start on April 15, your month ends on May 15. Having everyone do it exactly at the same time would be nice, because it would allow for maximum sense of camaraderie, but everyone has different schedules and this fuzzy month start/finish plan buys some of that without the inflexibility.

So, gather your ideas, make a commitment to do it, and hang on until at least April 1st and let the fun begin. I might hang on until after April 15th, when taxes are done, so that I can have that ‘poison’ out of my blood stream!

When I finish mine, I will post it on my website for all to see. So, I’ve committed myself to doing it. Now all I have to do is come up with an idea and wait until April! Perhaps you’re in a rut and haven’t been shooting as much as you like. This may give you that extra push that you want/need. At any rate, I think that it will be fun and I could really learn something.

About the picture: 30 second exposure, ISO 100 f/8 200mm. More fun with the Singh-Ray Vari-ND filter. Rocks at the bottom of a small waterfall in the gardens at UNCC.

 

pdlester_20070322_044.jpg
I subscribe to Google Analytics, as well as Feedburner. I like to check in to see how the website is going. It’s quite interesting. What I find most interesting, however, is how people come to find my site. For the past 3 months, or so, I’ve noticed a rise in hits on my site for the name Vicki Tillard. OK, who is Vicki Tillard? Well, the only one that I know was a fellow workshop participant in the Next Step workshop that I attended in March of 2007.

Vicki, pictured here, is an uber-talented photographer. She owns a ranch in Wyoming that has about a gazillion acres, and her photographs are quite stunning, to be honest. She’s also quite a hoot! She’s a strait shooter and doesn’t mind offering her opinion, when asked. I’d love to see her again, or perhaps visit her ranch in Wyoming, as I’ve never been to Wyoming and it would be great to see her again. BTW, here is a link to her site.
keywords.jpg

The funny thing is that I’ve only mentioned her once in my blog, in this post, and then not even including a last name. Somehow, Google is making an association between her name and my site, which this post ought to escalate that. Bizarre.

Mind you, the 3rd highest number of hits for the past 3 months makes sense. When I upgraded to WordPress 2.3, I had a major issue, but I resolved it and left some ‘bread crumbs’ for others to find. As a software developer, I know how frustrating it is to have a problem and only find the same questions, sometimes years old, but no answers … even though you know that it has been solved, no one bothered to post the solution. For a couple of months after the WP upgrade, this was my number one keyword hit.

Anybody else have bizarre keyword paths leading to their door?

 

pdlester_20080116_5152.jpg

Comparisons. They, unfortunately, are a way of life. From our early childhood we rank and label things. We categorize things as good, bad, right, wrong, tall, short, fat, thin, pretty, ugly, etc. Photography is not exempt from these attitudes. How many times have you thought that you should start a project, or perhaps should sell your work because it would mean that you are a ‘better’ photographer? I know that I’ve been down that road many, many, times.

I read a number of blogs daily and sometimes get hit with that feeling. For example, Mark Graf has a great gallery, sells his print, and is a prolific photographer. There’s always something new and wonderful to look at. Paul Butzi frames his prints and does gallery showings, Chantal Stone is shooting weddings, etc. Sometimes that little voice says: Hey! If you want to be better, you have to ____. However, I always come back down to reality and realize that each of us has a vision and a purpose for our photography. Each and every vision and reason is valid, even if no one else agrees with it.

When someone new to photography asks me what they should do to get better, my answer is usually the same. It’s the same answer for the question: Hey buddy! How do you get to Carnegie Hall? Practice!

How does one get better? It is a multi-step process, requiring the same time and effort as acquiring any other skill. Photography, while dealing in aesthetics, is a craft. This craft requires the artist, or crafts person, if you prefer, to become one with their tool so that the tool becomes an extension of the artist, not an impediment. The tool, much like a chisel or a paintbrush, is essential in helping you to convey your particular vision.

pdlester_20080116_5139.jpg
I think that once you get over the technical aspects of the camera:

  • Depth of field
  • Shutter speed
  • Aperture
  • Lens choice
  • Perhaps filter use

Then you can start working on the ‘soft’, or non technical parts of the picture such as composition, tonal range, color, etc. The next step then is your particular work flow. How do you get that picture to say what you want it to say. You’ve got a great exposure, lovely composition, great tonal range, but it’s missing something. This ‘something’ could be taken care of with programs, such as Photoshop, or Lightroom.

The next step, you may or may not choose to pursue, printing. It is a craft of its own.

Lastly, there’s the story itself. If you choose to do one. Do you pre-visualize and have an idea for a story up front? Or, do you post-visualize, that is assemble the story after the fact. Both are equally valid and, I think, equally powerful. Also, having pictures stand on their individual merit works well, too. A story need not always be told. For an interesting read, check out Julie’s post on the topic of projects. As for me, if I were to do a project, it would be after the fact. I usually don’t find good, heartfelt shots when I go out looking for them.

In the end, it’s about your vision and your decision is always the right one for you, at the moment. You even have the right to change your mind as frequently as you want to! However, during that time, practice, practice, practice. The more that you are out there shooting, the better ‘luck’ you have! :-)

Thanks for reading!

 

pdlester_20080115_5120.jpg

Well, this is post number 505, excluding some 100+ posts that I lost back in April of last year when I accidentally dropped my database … I still think that there should have been a confirmation dialog on that particular operation: “Hey, Dufus! Are you sure that you really want to drop your entire database and loose everything that you’ve done?”!!! This whole thing started in April of 2006, some 650 days ago, when I didn’t even know what a blog was. It all started here.

I’m not doing the one post per day anymore because I don’t really have a lot to say. :-) I’m really surprised that I was able to get 505 posts without repeating myself too much. The posts may now come in fits and starts. I might hit a run of 5 days in a row and then nothing for a couple of days. Also, my buddy Hobbs hasn’t provided me with any ideas recently. He’s into relaxing.

As always, thanks for reading!

© 2011 Paul Lester Photo Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Bad Behavior has blocked 409 access attempts in the last 7 days.