
For the most part I’ve been printing black and white prints and really like what I see from both of my printers. For 8.5 x 11, or smaller, I use the HP 7760. For larger prints, the Epson 3800. The HP does not have such things as printer profiles, etc. Instead, it has a built-in spectrometer that seems to get the colors very, very close to what I see on the screen!
The Epson, it would seem, needs a bit more interaction. Perhaps this is the nature of so called, professional printers. I experimented a bit with the Advanced Black & White mode, or ABW, on the Epson and tweaked things until I got what I wanted. It didn’t take long. Now, I’m really pleased with the output. The color, however, is a different beast. I’ve blown many sheets of paper on soft-proofing. Mind you, I profile my monitor about once per week using Spyder 2 Express. But, the results, that I get are not close to what I want. The prints seem to come out of the printer at about 2/3 to 1 stop underexposed, if they look right on the screen. They look rather dark, loosing some shadow detail, etc.
Taking Scott Kelby’s advice from his CS2 book for digital photographers, I tried soft-proofing and the setting suggested, which include selecting the No Color Control radio button. I get prints that are too dark. This seems to be the same experience that Laurie, from Capture This, got when she tried soft-proofing. We were sharing e-mails earlier on and she said:
With the soft proofing I do uncheck that box and it still makes it look really super washed out and if I adjust it to look “right” then it prints way to dark, darker than when I don’t soft proof. So my files already tended toward dark and soft proofing makes them artificially lighter so they would print even darker. It was quite a frustration for me. But I use Lightroom now which doesn’t have the soft proofing so it doesn’t really matter anymore. It’s become more of a beast I want to conquer rather than a tool that I want to use.
I’m rapidly approaching this same level of frustration. It would seem that it shouldn’t be this difficult to get the type of print that I want. Perhaps it’s a matter of learning curve, perhaps I haven’t paid my dues, or perhaps I got to use to the HP’s hassle-free way of printing. One thing that Laurie did warn me about was that I would probably go through a lot of consumables before I got it right. It looks like she’s probably right! Sigh …
I am, however, learning a lot. Printing is highly subjective and print output is better to be evaluated where the print will be viewed. There is a marked difference in perceived print color and contrast depending on major source of lighting within a room. Also, the color of the wall on which it will be hung, makes quite a difference.
If I view a print in my office, which is fairly dim, the print doesn’t look very good straight out of the printer; however, if I view it in the family room, with it’s 8 large windows, all facing south, the print takes on a very different characteristic. It looks more colorful, especially in the blue range, and is quite satisfactory. It also appears to have have a greater amount of contrast. Looking at the print in that very same room after about 4:00 PM, when the light has gotten warmer because of the impending sunset, the print looses some of it’s blueness, which may or may not be important, depending on the print.
There’s so much to learn. I think that I’d like to take a master printing class and see the potential of some of my photographs in the hands of someone who really knows how to bring out the best in the print. I’d like to learn. I don’t know what’s possible right now, I suppose.
In case any of you don’t know what PITA is, it’s Pain In The A$$!








Recent Comments