From time to time, I’ll go back and read: On being a photographer, which is a book written in an interview style. It’s a conversation between David Hurn, a Magnum photographer, and Bill Jay. I’ve read it a couple of times and each time that I read it I pick up a small nugget of wisdom that I hope not to forget.

Choosing a subject
Of particular interest was his idea about how to pick a subject. Certainly, this top has been beat to death, so I’ll be very brief so as not to annoy you. :-) He says that you should pick something that interests you. Something that you can study. You should make a list of all of the things that you find interesting. Cross of those items that cannot be represented visually, such as Greek philosophy. Further, cross off those that are not conveniently located or that you do not have access to. The remaining list has the potential subjects that you might pursue. He says that it should be very specific. For example, rather than to say “The Beach”, perhaps you could say “Couples showing affection on the beach.” This reduces down the subjects or actions to a manageable size such that you could create a meaningful body of work.

Pregnant moments
Next, he went on to talk about capturing a good shot. He talked about pregnant moments. Those moments that build to a crescendo and hopefully ‘deliver’. If you see one, you’ll recognize it. The example he used was of a man walking towards a woman; You’re anticipating a kiss; you take a few pictures as he approaches her, move your feet a bit to simplify the elements, continue taking pictures, wait, wait, wait, for the kiss, but in the end, he was just going to get a sandwich. Sometimes those moments work. Sometimes they don’t.

Does one size fit all?
I think that this technique works well for people or animal photography, but does it work well for the landscape, which is basically static, save for the ever changing light? Perhaps the changing of the light becomes the pregnant moment. Perhaps the changing breeze. Perhaps it’s waiting for the sun to be in the right position, shining on that little plant … the moment when all of the elements come together.

Related Posts :

  • There is nothing unusual for me to see the work of a great photographer, or at least one whose p ...

  • On the road again If you're interested in the various facets of the life of one of the worl ...

  • Temporal Each morning, before going to work I start my day by sitting in my favorite spot, re ...

  2 Responses to “Does one size fit all?”

  1. Oh, no. The landscape is anything but static. It changes every day. On the beach, it changes moment to moment.

  2. Maybe the fit isn’t about subjects, but rather photographers. I guess one can argue that all successful photographers shoot a subject that interests them, but I don’t think all of them have thought of it like that. I know for sure that when I start to think like you wrote above, I curl up and stop photographing. I just can’t use words like “pregnant moments” related to photography.
    Objectively I agree with what is written, and with Paul B, but I think every photographer need to find his or her own way of thinking. Why even think about it if you’re doing well as it is. That might work for some.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

   
© 2011 Paul Lester Photo Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Bad Behavior has blocked 228 access attempts in the last 7 days.