<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For the Newbies: Choosing a digital camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/2008/07/03/for-the-newbies-choosing-a-digital-camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/2008/07/03/for-the-newbies-choosing-a-digital-camera/</link>
	<description>Do not seek truth; only cease to cherish opinions.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:39:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/2008/07/03/for-the-newbies-choosing-a-digital-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-9017</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/?p=1813#comment-9017</guid>
		<description>I guess the last 2 comments easily qualify as spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the last 2 comments easily qualify as spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cool daddio</title>
		<link>http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/2008/07/03/for-the-newbies-choosing-a-digital-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-8835</link>
		<dc:creator>cool daddio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 01:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/?p=1813#comment-8835</guid>
		<description>Nice work on the for the newbies posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work on the for the newbies posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/2008/07/03/for-the-newbies-choosing-a-digital-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-8826</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/?p=1813#comment-8826</guid>
		<description>With the 5D there was a real argument for chosing Canon over Nikon, as it was the only affordable fullframe camera out there. But with the D700 now...

Oh well, let&#039;s face it, the differences are becoming smaller and smaller between Nikon and Canon. Not that this will stop any of those stupid flamewars in one of the techno-forums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the 5D there was a real argument for chosing Canon over Nikon, as it was the only affordable fullframe camera out there. But with the D700 now&#8230;</p>
<p>Oh well, let&#8217;s face it, the differences are becoming smaller and smaller between Nikon and Canon. Not that this will stop any of those stupid flamewars in one of the techno-forums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photo Buffet</title>
		<link>http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/2008/07/03/for-the-newbies-choosing-a-digital-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-8803</link>
		<dc:creator>Photo Buffet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/?p=1813#comment-8803</guid>
		<description>Paul, you&#039;ve given potential buyers a lot to chew on there.
I used a Nikon for years, and switched to a full-frame Canon DSLR in early 2007. Yes, it involved selecting lenses and hauling them around, but this 5D has been exactly what I was hoping for. 

It&#039;s true what you said at the end of your post--it&#039;s ultimately up to the user to get a good feel for what will work. That depends on our approach to photography, plus more practical points that you mentioned. 

Great post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, you&#8217;ve given potential buyers a lot to chew on there.<br />
I used a Nikon for years, and switched to a full-frame Canon DSLR in early 2007. Yes, it involved selecting lenses and hauling them around, but this 5D has been exactly what I was hoping for. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s true what you said at the end of your post&#8211;it&#8217;s ultimately up to the user to get a good feel for what will work. That depends on our approach to photography, plus more practical points that you mentioned. </p>
<p>Great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/2008/07/03/for-the-newbies-choosing-a-digital-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-8792</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 00:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/?p=1813#comment-8792</guid>
		<description>@Mark: I had heard about the D700, but didn&#039;t pay any attention until you mentioned it in your comment. Then, I went to have a look-see to find out what it was about. Dang! You&#039;re going to cost me some money. It&#039;s basically a D300 with a the FX, full-frame sensor, at a price that&#039;s about midway between the D300 and the D3. Curses! That puts it in the ballpark!

Finally, Nikon have knocked Canon on their collective behinds! These boys are for real!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark: I had heard about the D700, but didn&#8217;t pay any attention until you mentioned it in your comment. Then, I went to have a look-see to find out what it was about. Dang! You&#8217;re going to cost me some money. It&#8217;s basically a D300 with a the FX, full-frame sensor, at a price that&#8217;s about midway between the D300 and the D3. Curses! That puts it in the ballpark!</p>
<p>Finally, Nikon have knocked Canon on their collective behinds! These boys are for real!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/2008/07/03/for-the-newbies-choosing-a-digital-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-8791</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 20:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/?p=1813#comment-8791</guid>
		<description>The newly announced Nikon D700 has me thinking though... many of the features of the D3 and then some.   It has been a long time since you have heard about Canon users contemplating a switch to Nikon, but that day is now here with their current offerings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The newly announced Nikon D700 has me thinking though&#8230; many of the features of the D3 and then some.   It has been a long time since you have heard about Canon users contemplating a switch to Nikon, but that day is now here with their current offerings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/2008/07/03/for-the-newbies-choosing-a-digital-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-8777</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/?p=1813#comment-8777</guid>
		<description>@Rob: I think that you&#039;ll be fine, whichever lens lines that you choose, especially in the Canon, Nikon, or Pentax realm. I say look at the features of the camera, first. You&#039;ll find the lenses to match whatever you need to do. They all seem to offer a comparable line of lenses. Also, don&#039;t get hung up on the lens tests, etc. You&#039;re interested in shooting the real-world, not test charts!

There are some differences in lenses, to be sure, even in the same manufacturers lineup. For example, by far, my Nikon 80-200mm lens is the sharpest, out of the box, that I have; however, it&#039;s also my least used. All of the other lenses, down to the cheap-o 18-70mm kit lens that came with one of my cameras, work excellently.  The optics are great. Some of the cheaper lenses have plastic barrels and parts, which is why they are much cheaper, but some use the same grade of glass as the others.

So, it&#039;s up to you.  What fits? What feels good? Choose the right camera and you&#039;ll be pretty satisfied. 

Also, as you own a Nikon FE, you probably have lenses that fit it. Those lenses will still work on any of the Nikon digital cameras! You&#039;ll have to manually focus it, but it will still work! Nikon hasn&#039;t changed their lens mount since early 1950, I believe.  Lastly, you&#039;re used to the feel of Nikon and the location of the controls. All of these things are to your advantage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rob: I think that you&#8217;ll be fine, whichever lens lines that you choose, especially in the Canon, Nikon, or Pentax realm. I say look at the features of the camera, first. You&#8217;ll find the lenses to match whatever you need to do. They all seem to offer a comparable line of lenses. Also, don&#8217;t get hung up on the lens tests, etc. You&#8217;re interested in shooting the real-world, not test charts!</p>
<p>There are some differences in lenses, to be sure, even in the same manufacturers lineup. For example, by far, my Nikon 80-200mm lens is the sharpest, out of the box, that I have; however, it&#8217;s also my least used. All of the other lenses, down to the cheap-o 18-70mm kit lens that came with one of my cameras, work excellently.  The optics are great. Some of the cheaper lenses have plastic barrels and parts, which is why they are much cheaper, but some use the same grade of glass as the others.</p>
<p>So, it&#8217;s up to you.  What fits? What feels good? Choose the right camera and you&#8217;ll be pretty satisfied. </p>
<p>Also, as you own a Nikon FE, you probably have lenses that fit it. Those lenses will still work on any of the Nikon digital cameras! You&#8217;ll have to manually focus it, but it will still work! Nikon hasn&#8217;t changed their lens mount since early 1950, I believe.  Lastly, you&#8217;re used to the feel of Nikon and the location of the controls. All of these things are to your advantage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/2008/07/03/for-the-newbies-choosing-a-digital-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-8775</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 20:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/?p=1813#comment-8775</guid>
		<description>Paul,

Do you have any thoughts about lenses in general and the impact they have on making a DSLR purchase?  For example, when one looks to purchase a DSLR there is the camera (body) and the lenses to consider.  As you know, I am seriously looking at a Nikon (such as the D80).   While doing so, I am finding that the Canon EOS XSi is getting great reviews and Iâ€™m getting tempted to consider it instead.  Whatâ€™s holding me back are the lenses.  In other words, the Canon may be a better camera or (arguably) have more features, but I donâ€™t want to give up the line of Nikon lenses.  Of course if one plans to purchase a quantity of third party lenses, such as Tamron or Sigma, this is less of an issue.  And youâ€™re right, I canâ€™t prove that Nikon lenses are better than Canonâ€™s.  For me, though, I believe the lens (line of lenses) is going to make the final decision.  Right now Iâ€™m convinced I want to go with Nikon lenses.  I canâ€™t go with BOTH Nikon and Canon lenses. If I buy a Canon EOS, Nikon lenses are out as I canâ€™t really afford two lines of lenses.

So, if I decide Iâ€™m going with Nikon lenses, then the decision becomes which Nikon camera body works best for me (right now) and no Canon (or other brand of camera) is really an option, no matter how much â€œbetterâ€ it might be.  Then, if I decide to go with a newer or more professional (and expensive) Nikon later, itâ€™s OK as my lenses will still work with the new (additional) camera body.

--Rob Terry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,</p>
<p>Do you have any thoughts about lenses in general and the impact they have on making a DSLR purchase?  For example, when one looks to purchase a DSLR there is the camera (body) and the lenses to consider.  As you know, I am seriously looking at a Nikon (such as the D80).   While doing so, I am finding that the Canon EOS XSi is getting great reviews and Iâ€™m getting tempted to consider it instead.  Whatâ€™s holding me back are the lenses.  In other words, the Canon may be a better camera or (arguably) have more features, but I donâ€™t want to give up the line of Nikon lenses.  Of course if one plans to purchase a quantity of third party lenses, such as Tamron or Sigma, this is less of an issue.  And youâ€™re right, I canâ€™t prove that Nikon lenses are better than Canonâ€™s.  For me, though, I believe the lens (line of lenses) is going to make the final decision.  Right now Iâ€™m convinced I want to go with Nikon lenses.  I canâ€™t go with BOTH Nikon and Canon lenses. If I buy a Canon EOS, Nikon lenses are out as I canâ€™t really afford two lines of lenses.</p>
<p>So, if I decide Iâ€™m going with Nikon lenses, then the decision becomes which Nikon camera body works best for me (right now) and no Canon (or other brand of camera) is really an option, no matter how much â€œbetterâ€ it might be.  Then, if I decide to go with a newer or more professional (and expensive) Nikon later, itâ€™s OK as my lenses will still work with the new (additional) camera body.</p>
<p>&#8211;Rob Terry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
