On labeling things …

Returning from the beach
Yesterday I was reading Paul Butzi’s post about reality. Though the entire post was not about art, so to speak, one paragraph caught my interest:
I admit that I struggle with the whole ‘art’ concept. I’m no longer sure what art is, or if what I do is art. I’m more or less resigned to the fact that I’m going to do what I do (which is make photos to help me figure things out) and if people think it’s art, why, that’s fine. And if they don’t think it’s art, well, I guess I’m ok with that, too.
–Paul Butzi
Firstly, bravo for the last sentence!!! I’m glad to see he is totally doing it for himself.
Interesting, I thought, that we struggle with the word art. This thought hit me as I was doing my morning walk, which I am enjoying very much these days, especially since the weather is getting a tad bit cooler. I made a connection between walking and photography. Yesterday I stopped at Wal-Mart and picked up a heart rate monitor to keep track of my ‘effort’. Instantly, this morning’s walk nearly turned into a self-imposed competition. Suddenly, I was competing with myself to keep my heart rate up to a certain number, complete a mile in less than “x” time, etc. All I really wanted to do is see how ‘well’ I was walking. Fortunately, I reigned myself in, enjoyed the walk, and didn’t pay much attention to the monitor. I checked it a couple of times out of curiosity, but that was it.
With photography, I tend to run into that same scenario when I start with the thoughts of is it really art? How come I’ve never been published? Should I sell some of my work? All, if you think of it, outward signs of ‘success’, when all I want to do is take pictures of what ever appeals to me for whatever reason. I, unlike Paul, don’t even think that I’m trying to figure anything out. Perhaps I’m just trying to show appreciation for the things around me. Sometimes, especially when I point my camera towards my family, I’m trying to capture a feeling, a particular special moment, which later sparks sweeter, even more accurate memories.
Certainly, this is not to say that he should not think about such things. Photography, I think, is a fantastic way to work things out. Personally, though, when I start to think, is when I start to loose that ‘feeling’, whatever it is.
In the end, I guess, it’s just the pleasure of clicking the shutter … of which I’ve been doing too precious little of.
I read this post yesterday but wanted to take some time before commenting.
I’ve long struggled with the “What is Art” concept. Is it the pile of garbage that is suppose to represent some abstract meaning or the marks left by a canine from scratching on carbon paper with a canvas below? Some would say so.
The subject of Art can become even cloudier when dealing with photography. The “what is art” question has probably been around since the first cave drawings and deals with individual taste and concepts.
“Art is what’s left over after you’ve defined everything else†– Michael Vitale
“The artist is not a different kind of person, but every person is a different kind of artistâ€- Eric Gil
“Art is the most intense mode of individualism that the world has known.†– Oscar Wilde
IMHO: Art, in it’s truest form, is not about something created (such as a photo, painting, etc.) but about the process of individual creativity. In saying, “I’m not creating for others, I’m going to do what I do for me,” as Paul Butzi did, he’s actually embracing the truest spirit of an artist, the individual.
I like to think about the phrase, “A great work of art.” The key word for me is work (something on which exertion or labor is expended)…a labor of love.
My two cents.
@Earl: Great comment, Earl. I really like the quote by Eric Gil. I think that that says a lot.