Meet Bishop Raymond Williams. Early on Monday morning I felt the need to get out and shoot some pictures. My wife and I were staying in downtown Columbus, our son had just graduated from THE Ohio State University, and all was well. My wife was coming down with a cold or something and wasn’t feeling well, so she stayed in the bed.

Our hotel room faced nearly due east and I kept the curtains open just a slight bit so that I could see the dawn approach. It’s a beautiful sight. One that I don’t like to miss. As the day began, I got up, grabbed my camera, put on my 50mm lens, and headed outside into downtown Columbus. As I walked the streets, I snapped pictures here and there. On the way back towards the hotel, I noticed a man on the opposite side of the street doing a bit of preaching. Mind you, I used to not be one to approach someone on the street and ask to take their picture, especially a street preacher. i wanted to be as far away as possible. :-) However, there was something absolutely melodious and attractive about this man’s voice. So, I crossed the street to meet him.

He greeted me heartily, asked my name, shook my hand and then we started to converse. I guess what attracted me to him was that he was nice to everyone who passed, smiling and wishing them a blessed day. Most people, I saw, would not meet his eyes, which was a shame as they would have met a very kind and gentle soul and their day would have been changed, as mine was.

He told me that he was the ‘baby’ of 17 children. He is 72 and one of a few preachers in his family. I told him about my brother, Fred Jr., who is a preacher. He asked if I’d received my ‘calling’ yet. I told him no. He said that he could feel that it was only a matter of time for me. I simply smiled. In his presence, I was almost tearful. It’s hard to explain. I felt really loved just standing there next to him. I’ve never experienced that. It was strange and wonderful. I could have stayed there all morning, it seems. He just had that type of aura, power, energy, or whatever you choose to call it.

We talked about 30 minutes, then he was off to wherever else he was going and I was much richer for the experience and felt that I had had a ‘blessed’ morning just sharing that space with him for those brief moments. I’d certainly like to see him again and, should my travels take me there, I will. You can find him in front of the Starbucks on Capital Square in downtown Columbus, OH. You’ll be much richer for the experience, if you stop and talk with this wonderful man.

Before I left, he put his hands on my shoulder, closed his eyes, and said a prayer for me and my family and wished my son, Pedro, luck in finding a job. A blessed morning, indeed.

 


Welcome to the world, children!
Well, this chapter is finally finished! I spent the weekend in Columbus, OH attending my son’s, Pedro, graduation from Ohio State University. It’s been a long, and at times, very arduous journey, but at long last, he has graduated! Now, he just needs to find a job. :-)

The graduation was not without a bit of drama, though. On Friday, I called him to see how he was doing and he sounded a bit down. I asked what was wrong. He said that he had failed one of his classes and would not be graduating, but that he was going to talk to his teacher again and his counselor. We canceled our flight reservations. Later on, he called back to say that the teacher had made a miscalculation in the grades and that he would indeed be graduating. Fortunately, we were able to get the same flights for the same price!

So, off we went to Columbus. As it is only 7.5 hour drive, all of the ‘jets’ between here and there are commuter jets, otherwise known as puddle jumpers. We flew from Charlotte to Washington, DC, to Columbus, OH and back again in jets that held approximately 48 – 60 people! Tiny little things. This evening was pretty bad as there was lots of turbulance in and out of New Jersey on our way back. It was a bumpy ride, but we are home safely and now instead of having an Ohio State student, we now have an alumnus!

Congratulations, Pedro.

 

When I look at one of my images and try to decide if I like or not, I try to see a story, paragraph, or even a sentence of meaning … maybe even a word. Sometimes those words are there in quantity, other times the image remains mute, having nothing at all to say.

Yesterday, in the steady rain, I saw a number of possibilities of images that could have possibly spoken to me. There, in the glen, was a small stream burbling over the rocks. Standing sentinel over the bank, the watchful eyes of a Beech tree. There were any number of combinations of photos that I could have shot. Since I had on my boots, I could have gone into the stream, near it, almost anywhere. With my 50mm lens, or 18-270mm, I certainly could have had a composition that I would think would be, not only pleasing, but meaningful, too. A composition that would have given the viewer, a sense of that stream. A photo that spoke.

There were many times during this shoot when I thought to change lenses. Why? Because this was a once in a lifetime shoot. No, I wasn’t at any exotic location that I couldn’t get back to, but think about it … all of our shots are once in a lifetime. Never again will that exact moment pass, that exact configuration of time and space. It’s quite humbling. Sure, there will be other times that it will be raining, and I’ll be there, probably not with the Lensbaby, though.

Anyway, after having used the Lensbaby a number of times, I run hot and cold with it. I’ve seen some good portraits, but have yet to see any good landscape shots, but somehow, I keep believing that I might be able to pull one off. :-) No go. A lot of my landscape shots seem to give me motion sickness. It just looks unnatural. It looks gimmicky.

A friend of mine, Stephen, asked me if he should get a Lensbaby. I told him that I’d let him borrow mine for a month and he could see if it fit his particular shooting style. I told him that he’d either love it or absolutely hate it, but that it was for him to decide. Not me.

Going back to the above metaphor about pictures having something to say. If the picture has nothing to say in the first place, no amount of tricks, I think, is going to give it a voice. However, if you have found that photo that has a voice, then using the Lensbaby may introduce a bit too much noise and that voice may never be heard. It could be the wrong tool for the job, but it just isn’t getting the job done for me.

Determined not to give up, I’ve switched aperture disks and have gone from the f/4 to the f/5.6 to take away a little more of the effect. With a small enough aperture, I’m pretty sure that it will turn into a regular 50mm lens, albeit a very sloooooowwwww 50mm lens! We’ll see what happens. I’m going to try it on some different things, periodically.

 


I remember as a kid that whenever it rained during the warmer months that I would grab a Popsicle stick, an empty 1/2 pint milk carton, or anything that would float. I’d go to the front of the house, raincoat on, or not, and play in the water as it ran down the street. As our street was composed of dirt and cinder, it was easy to build a dam and pretend to have a boat trapped in the reservoir and then, all of a sudden, have the occupants of my ‘boat’ in peril, seeing them tumble over the edge of the broken ‘dam’! What great fun that was. Also, walking to school, one could not pass up the opportunity to step into every puddle possible and end up at school with waterlogged sneakers that itched and smelled during the day. :-)

It’s raining outside. It’s 42 degrees. What a perfect day to take pictures, to play in the rain! For the past few weekends, it has been raining off and on during the weekend. A couple of weekends ago, it rained all of Saturday and Sunday. This weekend, the same. I had it in my mind to perhaps visit Earl’s stomping ground, Bull Hole, which is about 80 – 90 minutes drive from home. I opted instead for what is becoming one of my favorite spots, Van Landingham Glen, which was the subject of my SoFoBoMo project last year.

I arrived sometime around 8:00 AM. It was raining, but only slightly. Thinking back to a previous post, I thought about which lens would I use. Would I use the wide-angle, the Lensbaby, the 18-270, or a combination of lenses. I decided to not decide at the moment and see what I saw when i got into the glen.

As I entered the glen, I found, as expected that the small creeks that are normally a trickle, were going pretty vigorously. The sound was wonderful. I just stood there for a moment, in the rain, listening to the rain’s rhythm tapped out upon the leaves, that wonderful melody provided by the stream, and an occasional heartfelt lyric delivered by a bird. Life at its finest.

I started with my 18-270mm lens. As I had on my over boots, I just plunged right into the stream and set up for a few shots. Normally, a stream will hold my interest for a very long time, but i had a distinct sense of been there, done that, and I wanted to try something different. So, I took the Lensbaby out of the bag and committed to using it for the entire rest of the shoot.

Immediately, I was flooded by a bit of anxiety. It came in the form of the thought: “You’re not going to get anything that you like with that Lensbaby. You know that!”. I almost changed back, but, as it turns out, I’ve been listening to more Byron Katie this week and I immediately questioned that thought:

Is that true? No! It’s not true. I could get some good pictures with it.
How do you behave, what happens, when you believe this thought? I feel anxious, unsure, and want to play it safe.
Who would you be without this thought? I’d be playful, willing to try different things, and just happy to be there, regardless of the outcome.

There’s more to the questioning, etc., but I’ll leave you to read that. Just follow the link. So, I left the Lensbaby on and for the next 75 or so minutes, I played. I was happy. I was wet. I was ‘there’!

Did I get any pictures that I liked with the Lensbaby. I’m not sure. I’ve not looked at them yet. I’m sure that there are probably a few keepers, but that wasn’t the point in the exercise. You’ll have to tune in tomorrow to see. :-)

The point was to enjoy myself and, as I loved to do, go outside and play in the rain.

 

I continue to read Twyla Tharp’s book, The Creative Habit. In one of her chapters, she talks about having too much experience, or not enough inexperience. The premise is that when we are inexperienced, we don’t have as much fear. We don’t have any idea of the limitations. Also, there is not that feeling of been there and done that.

Within the same chapter, she talks about warriors having “No favorite weapon”. That is because they never know where the attack will come from and which weapon they will need to use. Woe to you if you get into a sword fight and pull out your favorite weapon, a knife. It might not bode so well for you.

In thinking of this, I must admit that I do have my favorite weapons, or lenses if you will. My two favorites are the 18-270mm, for it’s convenience, and the 50mm just because I like the sharpness, the large aperture opening, and the field of view. As mentioned in other posts, I rarely use the 11-18mm; however, I think that I should use it a lot more often, as it takes considerable skill to use it and get good pictures out of it. I’m even going to give the much maligned Lensbaby a go for a while. Having a favorite and neglecting other lenses results in laziness and complacency. I can still get the shots, but, there just doesn’t seem to be anything new.

So, I am going to integrate a “clock like” methodology into my photography practice. I’ll practice with one lens for a while, then move on around the clock, practicing with each for a while, let’s say a month. Eventually, I’ll have to come back around to the beginning to start all over again. This could work with subjects, too. Shoot landscapes for while, people for a while, then architecture, macros, etc. It’s almost limitless and keeps you sharp and there is always something new.

I don’t know what the proper interval will be for me. Perhaps a week or two. I think that a month will be too long. We’ll see. I have no idea where I’ll start, though. It will be with the 11-18 or the Lensbaby. So, if you see a lot of LB shots or super wide angle shots in the next couple weeks, you’ll know.

 


One day, as I was driving around Charleston, SC it hit me! No, not another car, or even an errant seagull, but the fact that I’d not seen the Charleston city skyline. At first, I thought: Oh, I get it. Charleston is located on the peninsula, right at sea level and I live in Summerville, SC, which is an astonishing 89 feet above sea level! It must be too low for me to see.

So, off I go to consult with Google for pictures of “Charleston, SC skyline”. Hmmm, lots of pictures of the bridge and what not. No city lights. How odd. Every city, I thought, has a skyline! I’ve seen the skyline of Charlotte on my way to and from home. I’ve seen the skyline of Columbia, SC each week, too.

OK, one more resource! I consulted with Joan, over at Charleston Daily Photo and she told me that Charleston doesn’t really have a skyline. There are numerous restrictions on what can be built due to the historic nature of the city. So, all of the buildings are pretty short, but there is a wealth of history that I shall continue to explore. Lots of beautiful churches, old plantations, etc. dating from the 1600′s! Now that’s old!

So, it looks like I’ll be lurking around historic houses, easing through alleys, and peering into the numerous courtyards that are present. I’ll just have to be careful where I park!

 

I’m trying not to blog too much in advance of SoFoBoMo ’09; however, Paul B. had this post asking for those of us who did it last year to share our experience. Here’s what I think would make it easier for you first timers who would like to make a nice looking book AND don’t want to be driven crazy at the last minute:

  • Have a few ideas ready of a subject that will sustain you for the 30 days; probably half of which you will be photographing. The other half will be spent in assembly and writing.
  • Find the publishing software that you are going to use and learn it. I used open source software called Scribus. There is both a Mac and Windows version. This part is very important. You don’t want to be fighting the software while you are trying to assemble your book.
  • Get a good book on book layout and design and READ it. I really recommend Pete Masterson’s book: Book Design and Production
  • Make a practice book. Something easy. Something that you can do in a weekend. Nothing fancy. This will get you used to the software, placement, flow, etc.
  • Go to the library or bookstore and find photo books that appeal to you. These will give you good ideas about potential layouts.
  • Make sure that what you wish to photograph is easy to get to. This way you can visit it repeatedly in different light, weather, times of day, etc., giving you the full spectrum of moods, feelings, etc for your chosen subject.

Which reminds me, I need to do another practice book and review the Masterson book because I have forgotten many things about the software and the book!

If you did it last year and don’t want to right a post about it, please feel free to add your suggestions here.

© 2011 Paul Lester Photo Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Bad Behavior has blocked 409 access attempts in the last 7 days.