In response to the The value of critique post, Scott C said:

What I’ve found the most helpful are sites where a photographer posts a picture and then walks through their thought process in choosing the subject, composing, lighting, post-processing, etc. That type of talk-through helps me see into the photographer’s ideas. I can accept or reject the outcome, but at least I know why choices were made. This in turn helps me rethink my choices when I shoot because I have new ideas.
–Scott C

This statement has been at the back of my mind for several days and now, as things bubble up to the surface, I think that I’ll make an effort to answer it. Certainly, this speaks to my specific ways of doing things.

I am an intuitive shooter. That is to say that if I feel something, which sometimes gets distilled down to a single word, I’ll take a picture of it. While framing, there may be a mental discussion on how best to convey that one word. That word might be: awe, funny, tender, sweet, amazing, profound, or a number of other words.

But first, I have to be able to really see it, whatever it is. Our eyes play tricks on us. If you don’t believe it, just go here and have a look! Having that knowledge, I think is one key to ‘seeing’. I realize that my brain seeks to fill in the details with what it believes should be there based on prior experiences. It sees labels and assigns prior knowledge to that thing: “That is a blackbird. Over there is a tree. There are some people fishing, etc.”. Basically, it’s telling me that I already have ‘knowledge’ of what these things are, so I don’t need to explore.

When I’m out, most times I try to form a disconnection between the label and the thing. This is accomplished quite easily, sometimes, if you are patient. Have you ever written your name over and over and over again? Soon, the letters don’t even make sense anymore. They become gibberish. This is the same thing that happens when I sit quietly in a location. First, when I arrive, it is Azalea Park in Summerville, SC. Next, it is a bench in a park. Next, some trees and a path. Next some light, shadow, and a breeze, etc. Then it starts to fade into a bunch of abstract things. Soon, I start to see only shapes, colors, and activities with no labels attached. I can feel this shift. That’s when the single words, more like ideas than labels, start to appear. That’s when the shooting begins in earnest. It usually takes me about 10 or 15 minutes to get there, sometimes less, sometimes more, sometimes it just doesn’t happen. Prior to that, the rest is just warm-up on the way to that state. I’m easily brought out of this moment. All it takes is a word or two from a stranger, which happens frequently, or perhaps a call on my cell phone. *Poof*, back to left brain mode and thinking.

Sometimes, simply staring at something causes this transformation. Staring at a puddle, for example, that has plants sticking out of it suddenly becomes an exotic island full of possibilities. This is letting the labels drift away. Perhaps you have done this yourself. Have you ever found a nice place to lie down and have a look at the sky as the clouds drift by? Suddenly, after a period of relaxation, they are no longer clouds but all sorts of other shapes. If someone distracts you and you try to continue to see that other possibility, it’s difficult. You’ve slipped out of that moment. Thought and labeling have resumed. Back to clouds they go!

As for post processing, that too is a different realm. Again, I’m seeking to portray an idea that I had, rather than an actual photo of some ‘thing’. Sometimes what I see during the shot and what I see during the post processing are quite different and I come up with a different intention than when I started.

About this photo and the process: When I first arrived at the park, it was my intention to take a few photos, read a bit, walk a bit, then head home. I sat on a nearby bench for a while, read a little, then moved over to brick wall just at the head of this small path and continued to read. I stopped reading for a bit to have a look around. It was then that I noticed the different intensities of light and how this small path looked very inviting. So, I took several pictures using different focal lengths. In post processing, it looked pretty nice, but in color it looked ‘nice’, but it didn’t seem to portray what I wanted, which, I think was an invitation to walk down this path, or perhaps just look down it. I tried several variations of toning and finally landed here, giving it the proper amount of nostalgia, I think, and an inviting look.

Well, Scott, I hope that gives you a look into my process. A brief summary would be: I go. I wait to see what happens. I try to capture it. :-)

Related Posts :

  • Somewhere near Seattle Steve Weeks has a very interesting post, Perceptions Real or Imagined, ...

  • I'm not a big fan of labels. I suppose that they are necessary to give definition, especial ...

  • Looking for Paul When I got to the dunes, such a different environment, it took me a while ...

  7 Responses to “By request: The process”

  1. I find myself checking your blog daily. I very much enjoy your essays and ideas on photos and how you communicate with them. Your photographic work, in and of itself, is also very nice. Thanks.

  2. Paul,

    Thanks for being so accommodating and talking through that! As a newbie to photography (as something more than just snapshots at a family event), I found this post extremely interesting and helpful. For me, when I shoot pictures, I move around looking for a shot–looking for something that looks good. You said, “I wait to see what happens,” and also “When I’m out, most times I try to form a disconnection between the label and the thing.” I had never really thought of that. I’m still at the surface level of seeing–what I see I shoot if it captures my attention to begin with. I don’t wait to see what happens.

    I’m more of a “If I feel in the mood for it,” person. If I feel in the mood to write poetry, I do. If I don’t, I don’t. If I feel in the mood to write a post for my blog, that’s when I do it. If I feel like going out to shoot some pictures, that’s when I go. And I’ll end up cycling through my interests. So right now I’m really into trying to improve my photography. In a couple of months I might cycle back through a more intense desire to write poetry again. Etc.

    However, I do have times where I feel I need to spend more time in something, like poetry writing, for example. At those times I force myself to write, and I will sit there with pen and paper in hand (I prefer drafting that way instead of the computer) and maybe jot some things down until I *feel* like writing–that “shift” you mention. When that comes, I can get into the zone and really get going.

    But I never thought of doing that with photography. Thank you for that insight!

    I tend to like pictures with some nice contrasts, like black and whites and duotones. So the image at the top of your post really jumped out at me.

    Again, thank you for taking the time to write this extremely valuable post!

    -scott c

  3. @Mary Ann: Thanks for stopping by. I’m glad that you are finding some value here.

    @Scott: Mood has a lot to do with it. I try to make photography a daily practice. I really started doing the daily thing after I read Stephen King’s On Writing: A Memoir of the craft. He talks about sitting down to write every day, even if you are writing total crap. The same thing goes for my photography. There are many days when I come home with total crap.

    I, too, shoot what captures my attention, both initially and after that quiet time, or settling. What I’ve found out is that most of the time, the photos are better during the quiet times. The others seem to be repeats of what I’ve done before. Scales, if you will.

    I’ve gone out many times when not in the mood and have had that transformation happen and am extremely happy that I did go out, so I try not to let those initial moods affect me too much.

    You are more than welcome. Any ideas that you might have, just drop me a line and I’ll write about if I know anything about it.

  4. Paul, you are my guru. Your bravery to deconstruct your process inspires me.

  5. I think it is helpful not only to read about others’ process in their approach to making a photograph, but also to deconstruct your own. I have thought about documenting this myself – backing up from a scene and analyzing what brought me there to start with.

  6. @Mark: I’ll be looking forward to reading that post! I’m curious as to how others approach their photography, as well.

  7. Your willingness to share the details of your process is impressive enough, but your ability to do it so effectively is what makes this so valuable. This one (like many previous posts) bears re-reading and more than once.

    I will join the chorus encouraging Mark to write about his process.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

   
© 2011 Paul Lester Photo Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Bad Behavior has blocked 261 access attempts in the last 7 days.