9 comments on “You have to believe it yourself

  1. I know exactly what you mean – when you get lost in being a photographer, the self-conciousness falls away, time melts, and the external world outside of you, your subject and your camera disappears and your truly, “in the moment” and have become all you can. For me, it’s somewhat rare, though lately when I’ve gone out I’ve felt close to that nirvana even if I don’t cross into it.

    Of course, we learn by emulating those we admire – in photography, in writing and in life. There’s nothing wrong with it as long as you adapt it to your own unique set of tools and discover your own voice.

    Nice post and image.
    John recently posted..Mt. Evans AreaMy Profile

    • John: I think that it would be difficult not to emulate, given all of the wonderful imagery that is out there; however, eventually, we find our own ‘thing’ if we allow it to surface, other than that, we keep on emulating.

      I love those few, special times when I can fall completely into the photography, not a care in the world, just the click of the shutter. Few and far between and very special.

  2. “Sure, accolades are nice, but if you become a slave to them, you completely lose your way.”

    I like that statement Paul – holds very true for me and some of my decisions to break away from the camera club style. I was turned off by the whole competition aspect and going for the high scores. When I look at the photos posted today by this club I used to belong to, and the photos that were posted 5-10 years ago, they look much the same for those that all receive the highest scores. There is definitely a “style” that was rewarded – but it ends up making everyone’s images look the same.

    • Excellent point, Mark. I’m not necessarily against photography competition, but, as you mentioned, the same types win again and again. The loud, flashy, hyper-saturated, WOW! photo wins. There’s nothing interesting about the photo beyond the initial ‘shock and awe’ of it. There’s nothing that invites you to stay awhile. Sure, I have those types of photos that I’ve taken, but generally, my other photos align with my personality type, more quiet and thoughtful, I hope.

  3. It sure would be easier if we were trying to “hit” a stationary mark — but perhaps there’s a slim core of material or photographic style that always rings true for each of us no matter how our experiences or current interest change. I know I often experiment, inspired by outside influences, not simple to emulate other’s work but to push myself to discover what about it attracts me and how it may or may not fit within my own approach.

    I could build an argument we’re always actors…it’s just sometimes we play ourselves. :-)

    Beautiful photo and thought provoking post!
    Earl recently posted..The Cinque Terre, ItalyMy Profile

    • I could build an argument we’re always actors…it’s just sometimes we play ourselves.

      I loved that, Earl! Very profound and true!

      • I like that too Earl. The trick is figuring out which of those times are the ones when we are playing ourselves. As you imply in your post Paul, maybe those times tie in with the times when we are creating/photographing. At those times the personae and the masks are dropped and we are ourselves. I like to think that is the case.
        Cedric Canard recently posted..Life’s use-by dateMy Profile

  4. I couldn’t say that we are all actors but we each have different roles we have in life that may seem like acting. Husband, father, brother, co-worker, manager/supervisor, guy on the street. Life gives us a lot of diverse opportunities to express ourselves in many different ways. It’s not really acting, it’s human nature.
    ken bello recently posted..Welcome to New HampshireMy Profile

  5. When I step on the aircraft as a flight attendant, I am an actor. Somedays I’m excited to play the role and other days I just want to go back home. I feel I’m an introvert that works hard to be outgoing and personable when needed, which is the smaller part of who I am. I see much more simplicity in my images over the past few years. That is also true of my personal life. I find it difficult to define my photographic style and maybe that’s because it is a moving target as Earl mentions. Another great post, Paul!
    Monte Stevens recently posted..Being DifferentMy Profile

Comments are closed.