Singing in the rain
First, let me start with a disclaimer. I’m not advocating that you use your camera the way that I use mine. You have to do you and let me do me. :-) Now, on with the show:

When I had my Nikon D2x, since it was Nikon’s flagship camera at the time, I used to take it out into the rain, and, snow, humidity, whatever. I figured that if they said that it was sealed against the weather, then it dang will better be, and it was! It was a great camera. Unfailing. Well, the D300 comes from good lineage! Nikon says of the D300:

Rugged magnesium-alloy construction: Along with advanced dust and moisture protection and a durable shutter mechanism: The D300 has been tested to 150,000 cycles making it the perfect choice for photographers who demand high performance and agility.


Hmmm: Advanced dust and moisture protection. Well, that sounds like a challenge to me. I’ve seen a few places where people talk about the weather proofing of the D300, but didn’t see where anyone had actually tried it. I saw on Luminous Landscape where Michael Reichmann talked about his experience on his Antarctic trip and how well the Nikon cameras did as a group in some tough conditions, but never had I seen any direct experience.

Three of the last four weekends, it has rained in Charlotte and I took advantage of every one of them. When I say rained, I mean it rained! The type of rain that would have you soaked in less than a minute or two. Unrelenting rain. Downpour! Perfect. I simply put on my boots, went out, found a place to take pictures, and let Nature have its way with me and my camera. I was not concerned about the camera, but was a little concerned about the lens. Both came through the ordeals just fine.

It was quite comical, to me at least, to see people cruising by in their cars, slowing down to see what moron was out shooting in heavy rain. Well, that moron was me. I was happily shooting away. Water was running over and off of my camera in small streams, down my forehead, around and through my eyes. I kept the sunshade on the lens and the camera pointed downward so as not to have to dry the lens … that would have been kind of tough anyway because there was barely a strip of dry cloth on me anywhere. I was soaked. Next time, I could use a rain poncho for myself! :-) However, I’m pretty waterproof.

Anyway, it was a fun time in the rain. The temperature was about 70 degrees (21 degrees C for my Metric friends) and the rain was nice and warm. So, three times in a row, the D300 proved itself under less than ideal conditions … as did the Tamron 18-270mm! Well done, guys!

No. I do not use any type of cover over the camera. I guess that you could say that I trust Nikon’s statement! So far, no leaks and no dust on the sensor in a whole year! Not a speck of dust that I can see! I had thought of doing something about shooting in the rain for SoFoBoMo, but I cannot trust that it will rain a lot in may or June! :-)

 

pdlester_20080206_2315.jpgWhen I had my Minolta DiMage A1, it was pretty cool. For the most part, I really liked the camera and it had some nice features, but it was limited in that it was a digital camera, but you couldn’t change lenses. It had a 7x optical zoom, which was nice, but if you wanted to get ultra-wide or zoom in really tight, you were very limited. One of the things that I never really got used to with the camera was that it didn’t a real viewfinder. The viewfinder was one of those electronic viewfinders. After using a film camera for such a long time and having a crystal clear viewfinder, it was very difficult to get used to. I never did.

It did have an advantage, though, in that when you made changes to white balance, for example, you could see what the result was going to be without taking a picture. You also had the option of looking at the image on the viewfinder on the rear of the camera.

I got rid of that camera a couple of years ago, maybe less, when I leaped up to the the D2X. It was quite a leap and one that I never regretted. However, there were some times when I wished that the D2X could show me the scene through the screen on the back. In particular, when I was in a tight spot, shooting overhead, or shooting really low to the ground. That would have been handy!

Well, Nikon heard my thoughts, as well as the thoughts of a lot of other people and added Live View to their latest cameras, the D300 and D3. Funny, when I heard about it, I actually thought: “What use is that?!” How soon we forget.

The picture that accompanies this text was taken with Live View. I was on the other side of the tracks when I heard the railroad crossing sounds and saw the gates come down. There was no train, but a work detail that was working on the tracks. I’d never seen such a detail and wanted to get a picture, but the tracks were to my back. I would have had to place the car in gear, get out, take a picture, and get back in. I was feeling kind of lazy, so that was out. Instead, I rolled down the back right window, placed the camera on Live View mode, pointed the camera out of the window, composed, and took the shot!!!

Hmmm, that D300 Live View comes in handy!!!

 

pdlester_20080129_1841.jpg

After using the Nikon D300 for a few days, I must say that I’m impressed. Mostly, because they’ve taken all of the features of the D2X, added a few new ones, including an improved sensor, and automatic sensor cleaning and at a price point that makes it affordable for serious amateurs or professionals just starting out.

The camera is so good, in fact, that it made me decide to not sell my D2X. How’s that? As I said, all of the features of the D2X are there and then some. The build of the D300 does not seem as rugged as the D2X, perhaps this has to do with the weight of the camera. However, if you add the optional MB-D10 battery grip, they weigh nearly the same and have the same ability to shoot vertically without having to wrap your hand around the camera.

With the release of Nikon’s new cameras, the D300 and the D3, the D2X has depreciated to about $1200 – $1500, from a going price of $4,999 less than 2 years ago. A brand new D300, with the grip, can be had for about $2,000. The camera costing $1,799, the grip about $260. It’s newer technology, higher/cleaner ISO capability, and has better auto focus technology than the D2X. It has now become my go-to sports camera. The D2x will remain in my bag for landscapes as I don’t intend on buying the RRS L-Bracket for the D300, which would add an additional $180 to the equation. The main reason that I won’t sell the D2X is that it never hurts to have an excellent backup AND, it is a hell of a good camera. Now, which camera is the backup? Neither and both. They will serve their roles and become backups for each other.
pdlester_20080129_1528.jpg
On tomorrow’s post, I plan to talk a bit about my impressions of the D300′s auto focus capabilities. If you’ve ever shot a high school basketball game from the baseline, you know what a challenging environment that can be! The action is fast, furious, and difficult to follow. You are allowed to get as close as about 6 feet from the action. With distances that short and the inherent high speed nature of the game, it can tax any auto focus system. We’ll see how the D300 did!

 

pdlester_20080125_0286.jpg

It’s been over 3 weeks since I put the Nikon D3 on order. Friday, I canceled the order and picked up a Nikon D300 instead. Why? Some of the reasons are personal, some are practical. On the personal side, my spiritual growth has gone very far away from rampant consumerism. Certainly, there is a bit of consumerism left, which partially explains the purchase. I could have lived just fine without the camera.

In reading about the improvements, the D300 has a bit more functionality than my D2X; however, after holding and using the D300, I still prefer the heft and feel of the D2X. My main reason for purchasing the D300 was for the improved auto focus. Mind you, with the D2x, it was a rare occasion that I missed a shot. I have lots of great basketball photos with that one. The D300 now has 51 focus points instead of the 9 offered by the D2x. These 51 points offer finer focus detail. Also, with the shape recognition firmware, the tracking should be better.

There is also a lot less noise at the higher ISO settings. For example, I shot a couple of shots at ISO 3200, like this picture of Tony going to the hole in his Friday night basketball game. With the D2x, this type of shot would have so much noise as to barely be usable. Even worse would be a night shot at ISO 3200. The black areas would be full of noise.

Also on a practical level, there was the price difference of $3,200 as well as the way that I use the camera. The D3 is full-frame sensor. This really only comes into effect when shooting super wide angle shots. My widest angle lens is an 11-18mm DX lens. This gives an effective focal length of about 17-27mm. So, the widest shot that I can take is at about 17mm equivalent. No big deal. Even when shooting film, I never had a lens wider than 20mm, so I’m still ahead. Further to the point of practicality, in order to make good use of the D3, I would need to sell 4 of 5 of my lenses and get their equivalent non-DX versions, or else I’m basically taking a full frame camera and shooting DX all of the time. This makes no sense. Since I didn’t want to replace all of the lenses, etc, it made perfect sense to get the D300.

Lastly, there was a bit of ego involved. I wanted to have the latest, greatest, and most-up-to-datest Nikon flagship camera, but it wouldn’t make any better pictures than any camera that I currently have in my possession, it would only displace an additional $3,200 that could be used to pay of some bill, take a trip, or do something else.
pdlester_20080126_0953.jpg
The final nail in the coffin was when I spoke to Richard and he asked me some of these very same questions and I couldn’t provide good enough answers for myself. After talking to him, I immediately canceled my order, called Wolfe Camera, and went to pick up my D300. It was a good purchase and I’m looking forward to using more for sporting events than anything.

As I discover new things about the camera, I’ll post it.

About the bottom picture: This picture was taken at ISO 3200 with the D300. Notice the black area. Hardly any noise visible. Even on the full sized picture. Amazing!

© 2011 Paul Lester Photo Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Bad Behavior has blocked 394 access attempts in the last 7 days.