<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Paul Lester Photo &#187; For The Newbies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/category/for-the-newbies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>Living through the lens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:27:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By request: How not to suck at photography</title>
		<link>http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/2008/07/14/by-request-how-not-to-suck-at-photography/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/2008/07/14/by-request-how-not-to-suck-at-photography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[By request]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[For The Newbies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/?p=1830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to this post, Rez said: Paul, I desperately need to learn how to take photos like you. I dont try to pose off people, but with you i make the exception. Please write about this if you can in your coming blogs. kind of a like a tutorial on how not to suckâ€¦iâ€™d <a href='http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/2008/07/14/by-request-how-not-to-suck-at-photography/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/pdl_20080128_00031.jpg"/><br />
In response to this <a href="http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/?p=1822">post</a>, Rez said:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Paul, I desperately need to learn how to take photos like you. I dont try to pose off people, but with you i make the exception.</p>
<p>Please write about this if you can in your coming blogs. kind of a like a tutorial on how not to suckâ€¦iâ€™d be very grateful.
</p></blockquote>
<p>First, a sincere thanks for the compliment.  Now, so that we&#8217;ll know what the heck I&#8217;m talking about, let&#8217;s define that word, suck.  I would, for the purpose of this post, define it as a serious dissatisfaction with the output of one&#8217;s own work.  As in, all of my pictures suck, or at least the majority of them!</p>
<p>I do my best not to judge the work of others, other than to say, it appeals to me or it doesn&#8217;t. I&#8217;ve seen lots of work that hasn&#8217;t appealed to me, but that certainly doesn&#8217;t mean that it sucks. It simply means that I didn&#8217;t like the subject matter or the way that it was portrayed.  That&#8217;s it.</p>
<p><strong>Practice</strong><br />
The answer is quite simple and contained in the punch line to this joke:</p>
<blockquote><p>
A New Yorker (or in some versions Arthur Rubinstein) is approached in the street near Carnegie Hall, and asked, &#8220;Pardon me sir, but how do I get to Carnegie Hall?&#8221; He replies, &#8220;Practice, practice, practice.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Types of practice</strong><br />
Of course, you could go outside and practice, practice, practice, with no particular goal in mind. This type practice is not so effective as goal-oriented practice.  First, you need to find what you like. Then, you need to find your voice, or what you have to say about it.  You may like sunsets, sunrises, people, frogs, parking lots, discarded shopping carts, tin cans, road signs, fog, etc.  Who knows? The world is a very big place with lots of interesting things!</p>
<p>The most important aspect of the whole thing, I think, is to get that camera in your hand and shoot, shoot, shoot.  Don&#8217;t be afraid to experiment with different ways of shooting, even if someone else says that it&#8217;s wasteful, fruitless, unorthodox, etc. So what. What works for them, might not work for you. Do your thing.  If you have an idea, follow it.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/pdl_20080128_0025.jpg" style="float:right"/><br />
<strong>The work of others</strong><br />
In finding your voice, you&#8217;re going to run across the work of others that you like.  Keep viewing the work of other photographers that you like until you discover why you like it. This is a huge clue in finding your voice.  Perhaps you like the photographer&#8217;s choice of subject; the use of lines and shapes;  the bold use of color; the abstract nature of the photo; the sentimentality of the subject matter.</p>
<p>We all seem to start by mimicry.  I know I certainly did. I remember how captivated I was by Ansel Adams&#8217; photographs when I first saw them. Every landscape photographer that I knew, seemed to want to be like AA.  Similarly, in the early 80&#8242;s and 90&#8242;s, nearly every basketball player wanted to be Michael Jordon.  When they went to the playground, they tried the moves that they saw Michael do last night, or perhaps they would practice the move in the driveway a few hundred times before putting it on display to the rest of the world (playground).  Eventually, they added their own particulars and made it their own.</p>
<p>The methods are same. See something that you like. Try to duplicate it.  Practice. Practice. Practice. Add your own flavor. Make it yours.  Sure, there are those critics who will yell &#8220;derivative&#8221;.  So what. Ask to see their portfolio! <img src='http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   You have to be pleased with your work.</p>
<p><strong>Proficiency</strong><br />
I think that you have to be technically proficient with your camera before you can become very expressive with it.  The camera can get in the way if you don&#8217;t know how to use it. It can be a frustrating experience. Even if you understand color, lines, composition, etc, it really doesn&#8217;t so much matter if you cannot get the exposure right or figure out why your pictures are constantly blurry. Technical excellence turns the camera into an extension of your imagination, not a roadblock.  </p>
<p><strong>Acceptance</strong><br />
You have to accept where you are at this moment and realize that as long as you keep shooting and evaluating, not judging your work as good or bad, then you are growing. Evaluate the merits of the photograph to decide if you met your goal for the picture.  Did I capture the feeling that I was trying to? Am I satisfied with the result?  What more could I have done to make the shot more appealing to me? What if &#8230;?  Again, the merits of the photograph, not the abilities of the photographer. Tell the inner-critic to take the day off. You&#8217;re not interested in his/her opinion of your skills!</p>
<p><strong>The paradox</strong><br />
Don&#8217;t look for your voice to hard. You won&#8217;t find it. You&#8217;ll have to be quiet. You have to listen for it. Just keep shooting and, over time, it will find you. You&#8217;ll be drawn towards that which you like and that which speaks to you.  When you start to over-think it, that&#8217;s when the confusion and anxiety sets in. Have fun and don&#8217;t let anyone tell you that you are doing &#8216;it&#8217; wrong.  There is no right or wrong. It&#8217;s simply what works for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/2008/07/14/by-request-how-not-to-suck-at-photography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For the Newbies: Shutter Speed</title>
		<link>http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/2008/07/02/for-the-newbies-shutter-speed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/2008/07/02/for-the-newbies-shutter-speed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 04:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For The Newbies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techy Stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/?p=1802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a previous post, I spoke about the aperture. Now, I&#8217;d like to talk about the other half of the exposure dynamic duo, shutter speed. Whereas aperture had everything to do with the lens, nothing to do with the camera. Shutter speed is the opposite. It has everything to do with the camera, nothing to <a href='http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/2008/07/02/for-the-newbies-shutter-speed/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/pdlester_20070328_0311.jpg"/><br />
In a <a href="http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/?p=1796" target="_blank">previous post</a>, I spoke about the aperture. Now, I&#8217;d like to talk about the other half of the exposure dynamic duo, shutter speed. Whereas aperture had everything to do with the lens, nothing to do with the camera. Shutter speed is the opposite. It has everything to do with the camera, nothing to do with the lens. OK, view camera boys, back off! I&#8217;m talking SLRs! <img src='http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But first, I have to answer a question: Yes? You in the back! &#8230; *groan* No, shutter speed has nothing to do with wind velocity, hurricanes, or wooden shutters! Sheesh!</p>
<p>A major disadvantage of some of the point and shoot camera crowd is a lack of ability to control the shutter speed or aperture. Basically, you get what the camera gives you. The camera works to get you a clear picture where everything is in crystal-clear focus.  But, what if that is not what you want?</p>
<p><strong>Blurring on purpose? Absurd!!!</strong><br />
The above picture, my son&#8217;s basketball team running &#8216;suicides&#8217;, was done using a method called panning.  You hold the camera at eye-level and rotate at the waist while following the action. You need to use a slow shutter speed, in this case 1/8 of a second, in order to get the blurred effect.  This effect gives the picture a sense of motion.<br />
<strong>What is shutter speed?</strong><br />
Shutter speed is the amount of time expressed in seconds, or fractions of seconds, that the shutter curtain is open and allowing light to fall upon the sensor or film.  My Nikon D300 has shutter speeds ranging from 30 seconds, on the long end, all the way up to 1/8000 second, on the high end.  There is even a &#8216;bulb&#8217; setting that allows you to hold the shutter open for as long as you want.  This can make for some interesting night shots.    Exposure = quantity (aperture) + time (shutter speed).<br />
<img src="http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/pdlester_20070819_0213.jpg" style="float:right"/><br />
<strong>Fast shutter speeds</strong><br />
Higher shutters speeds, generally speaking, are about 1/250 second or greater. Higher shutter speeds allow you to freeze action. This comes in very handy when you are shooting sports, or some other fast paced action that you&#8217;d like to freeze.  You can capture a moment in time, like the picture of this diver to the right, at the point of no return. Notice how the water droplets at the bottom of his shorts are frozen in time.<br />
<img src="http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/pdl_20080629_57241.jpg" style="float:left; margin-right:5px"/><br />
<strong>Slow shutter speeds</strong><br />
Slower shutter speeds allow you to capture motion over time.  It gives your image an overall artistic feel.  My favorite motion studies are of water. I like to set my camera upon the tripod and expose an image for multiple seconds.  Of course, you have to have a fairly low light level to do this, or a filter that reduces the amount of light coming in so as not to overexpose (let in too much light) the picture. In this photo, to the left, the shutter has been left open for about 20 seconds. Everything that is stationary, rocks, plants, etc. remains in sharp focus. That which is moving, the water, takes on a pleasant blurred effect.  This type of shot can only be accomplished by using a steady tripod, or some type of camera support.</p>
<p>Without a tripod, save for panning, slow shutter speeds can be a disadvantage because they record camera shake.  You may have the hands of a surgeon, but surely you cannot hold perfectly still. Your breathing, heartbeat, and nervous system all contribute to camera shake. Additionally, where you stand, how you stand, the wind, etc. make their own contributions to this vibration. Lenses with image stabilization help to reduce this vibration, but are no substitute for a good tripod, but that&#8217;s another article all together.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s rather difficult to get sharp, hand-held pictures at the lower shutter speeds. A rule of thumb for selecting a shutter speed is that you shouldn&#8217;t shoot at speeds less than 1/focal length. So, if you have a 50mm lens, then don&#8217;t hand hold at less that 1/50 second. The longer the lens, the higher the needed shutter speed.  A 500mm lens would require at least 1/500 of a second. Personally, I like to double that number, and prefer not to hand hold under 1/(2 * focal length).  Mind you, only a very small percentage of my shots are taken hand held, save for sports.</p>
<p>Well, I cannot beat this horse anymore.  So, I&#8217;ll just have to get another one ride off into the sunset. Until next time! (No horses were harmed in the making of this post!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/2008/07/02/for-the-newbies-shutter-speed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For The Newbies: Aperture</title>
		<link>http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/2008/06/30/for-the-newbies-aperture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/2008/06/30/for-the-newbies-aperture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For The Newbies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/?p=1796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Creative use of DOF When finished, hopefully you&#8217;ll know what is an aperture and why it&#8217;s important. So, let&#8217;s start: An aperture is, quite frankly, a hole. By varying the size of this hole, we can increase or reduce the amount of light that reaches the sensor. Say what? Let me put it another way. <a href='http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/2008/06/30/for-the-newbies-aperture/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/pdl_20080328_13001.jpg"/><br />
<strong>Creative use of DOF</strong></p>
<p>When finished, hopefully you&#8217;ll know what is an aperture and why it&#8217;s important.  So, let&#8217;s start:</p>
<p>An aperture is, quite frankly, a hole. By varying the size of this hole, we can increase or reduce the amount of light that reaches the sensor.  Say what?  Let me put it another way. Let&#8217;s talk very briefly, first, about exposure.  Exposure is the amount of light + the amount of time that the light is left on the sensor, or film.</p>
<p><strong>A jug of water</strong><br />
In order to have a property exposed picture, you need the right combination of light + time.  If you have a container that holds liquid, for example, a 1 gallon container, when you go to the sink, or perhaps to the garden hose, you can control the filling of that container by varying the quantity of water that is coming out of the hose.  If you open the spigot to its maximum opening (aperture), then the container will fill very quickly. However, if you let but a trickle of water come out at a time, it might take several hours to fill the container.  This is exposure. Time + quantity (intensity) of light. The intensity being controlled by how wide you open the spigot.  The time that is needed to fill the container, shutter speed.</p>
<p><strong>Away from water. Back to cameras.</strong><br />
If you were to take one of your lenses, hold it to the light and look through it, you&#8217;d see a hole created by diaphragm blades.  If your lens has an aperture ring, turning the ring would make the opening larger or smaller, depending on the direction that you turn.  The purpose of this hole is to increase or reduce the amount of light coming into the camera.  This is your aperture.<br />
<a href="http://web.uvic.ca/ail/techniques/phototechniques.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/aperture_image.jpg" style="float:right"/></a><br />
<strong>What do all of those numbers mean?</strong><br />
Looking at my 50mm lens, I see the following numbers: <strong>1.8, 2.8, 4, 5.6, 8, 11, 16</strong>.  Looks like some weird math sequence that you&#8217;d have to figure out for a college entrance exam, doesn&#8217;t it?   Well, these numbers are aperture numbers, or f-stops, and each one of them, starting left to right, represents a smaller aperture, that is, it lets in less light (1/2 the amount of the previous number). The bigger the number, the less light it lets in.  Think of it as a divisor.</p>
<p><strong>A little math! Piece of Pi !</strong><br />
Uh, oh! No one said that there would be math involved!  You can skip this part if you don&#8217;t want to know <em>why</em> these numbers are as they are.  Let&#8217;s just say that it has to do with circles and Pi.<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aperture" target="_blank"><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/a/d/c/adcd8400b9cff8f5ae4ff1cac2074b07.png"/></a></p>
<p>So, if you decided to keep reading, here&#8217;s what those numbers mean:<br />
Given the above formula, let&#8217;s plug in some values for a 50mm lens:<br />
f = focal length<br />
N = the aperture Number.<br />
Area = 3.14(pi) * ( 50/2 * 4 )^2<br />
Area = 3.14 * ( 50 / 8 ) ^2<br />
Area = 3.14 * (6.25)^2<br />
Area = 3.14 * 39.06<br />
Area = 122.7 square millimeters (area of the circle).</p>
<p>Using the same calculations for the same lens, but different aperture (5.6), gives and area of 62.6 square millimeters, or approximately 1/2 of the surface area, so one half of the light!  Isn&#8217;t math wonderful?. Try it for the others and you&#8217;ll see that the math works.  Now you know why each step to a higher number results in half of the light being let through, and each full step to a lower number, twice the light. You are changing the surface area of the hole.</p>
<p>For your math savvy folks, the above formula is the calculation for the area of a circle. pi * r^2. The division in the ( ) is the calculation for the radius, but enough of this math stuff!</p>
<p><strong>So, that&#8217;s all very interesting. How can I use this?!</strong><br />
OK, now that we know how to control the the quantity of light coming through, what advantage does it offer us?  This allows us to control our depth of field.  Depth of field is how much, front to rear, of our picture is in focus.  We might not always want everything in focus from the tip of John&#8217;s nose to the end of the street.  We might want to isolate John and provide a nice, blurred background.<br />
<a href='http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/aperture1.jpg'><img src="http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/aperture1-207x300.jpg" alt="" title="aperture1" width="207" height="300" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1798" style="float:right"/></a><br />
<strong>DOF and Bananas (click for larger image)</strong><br />
Depth of field can be altered by many factors: focal length of lens, distance of lens to subject, aperture, distance of subject to background, etc.  For the purposes of this article, we&#8217;ll stick with depth of field as it pertains to aperture.  We&#8217;ll also only demonstrate DOF for one lens, a 90mm f/2.8.</p>
<p>Because the birds won&#8217;t hold still long enough for me to take 8 shots in a row, I had to use some bananas that I had sitting around. Bananas are very cooperative, as a bunch, generally! <img src='http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As you can see, each step down (move to a higher number, smaller aperture) in aperture causes a corresponding increase in depth of field.  When I was at f/2.8, the banana was very well isolated from the background and only that point that I focused on, at the stem, was in sharp focus. As I decreased the size of my aperture, more things start to come into focus, which may or may not be what I really wanted.</p>
<p>In this way, DOF can be used not only to control the amount of light coming in, but to also control what appears in acceptably sharp focus. So, now you know!</p>
<p><strong>Aperture Priority / Aperture Value (AV)</strong><br />
This is the mode on a camera where you choose one half of the exposure equation, the aperture, and leave the camera to choose the other, shutter speed. That&#8217;s it!</p>
<p><strong>Other things: Fast lenses</strong><br />
OK, so you&#8217;ve heard the term, perhaps, &#8220;fast lens&#8221;.  It has nothing to do with how fast you can put it onto your camera! <img src='http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   It may have to do with how fast it can drain your bank account, though!  Fast lenses can be a lot more expensive than their slower counterparts. They are also heavier because they use larger pieces of glass to let in more light.  </p>
<p><strong>A tale of two lenses</strong><br />
For example, a Nikkor 300mm f/4 costs $1,124, while the same type of lens, one stop faster, the Nikkor 300mm f/2.8 VR costs a whopping $4,449!  You pay a lot for that extra stop of light. A lot of engineering goes into that lens.  Also, the former weighs in at 3.5 pounds (1.6 kg), the latter, 6.3 pounds (2.9 kg).  Certainly something to consider when making a purchase.</p>
<p>A fast lens means, generally, those with maximum apertures of 2.8 or more. Remember, the smaller the number, the wider the opening.  Think divisor.  Fast relates to shutter speed.  The wider the lens opening, the faster shutter speed you can use for the same lighting conditions.  For example, a 100mm f/2.8 is a faster lens than a 100mm f/3.5, by almost a complete stop (1 stop equals twice or 1/2 as much light, depending on the direction that your heading.).  So, it is a stop faster.</p>
<p>Now, hopefully, you know about apertures, how they affect exposure, and why having control of it can be important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/2008/06/30/for-the-newbies-aperture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Something for the newbies</title>
		<link>http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/2008/06/22/something-for-the-newbies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/2008/06/22/something-for-the-newbies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 12:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For The Newbies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/?p=1780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wouldn&#8217;t spend more than $100 on a tripod. They&#8217;re all the same. -Wolf Camera Employee When I was a Newbie photographer, things were complicated enough. We had to make choices between aperture priority, shutter priority, manual, or a bit later, program cameras. There were all sorts of film choices and heaven help you if <a href='http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/2008/06/22/something-for-the-newbies/'>[...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
I wouldn&#8217;t spend more than $100 on a tripod.  They&#8217;re all the same.<br />
-Wolf Camera Employee
</p></blockquote>
<p>When I was a Newbie photographer, things were complicated enough.  We had to make choices between aperture priority, shutter priority, manual, or a bit later, program cameras. There were all sorts of film choices and heaven help you if you decided to develop your own film. Now, add choices of film developer, paper, paper developer, enlargers, fixers, etc.  Unfortunately, camera store employees, especially in the big chains, were of little help.  They had a passing interest in photography, at best.  The very small stores where were you wanted to go.  And, if you can believe it, there was no such thing as The Internet!  Now, with digital, the choices seem endless. The situation has not improved. What&#8217;s a person to do???</p>
<p><img src="http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/pdl_20080614_5285-edit1.jpg" style="float:right"/></p>
<p><strong>Stephen&#8217;s story</strong><br />
Yesterday, I had a conversation with my friend Stephen, of <a href="http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/?p=1445">Two Black Guys in a ditch</a> fame, and he was relating to me his experience of going into Wolf Camera and trying to purchase a camera.  He said that when he went in he kind of new what he wanted, but not really.  A friend or coworker had suggested that he get a Nikon D80, but hadn&#8217;t really given him more information as to why he should make that purchase. Could he have gotten a D40, D40x, D70, or perhaps he should have gotten a D200, D300, or perhaps a D3?  What about Canon? Pentax?  The choices seem endless.  He even said that after he got home and started looking at all of the controls, he thought that he might be in over his head!</p>
<p><strong>All tripods are the same</strong><br />
After he got into the camera store, the sales person started offering to sell him all sorts of stuff like filters, extended warranties, other lenses, etc.  He didn&#8217;t really know what to buy.  He just knew that he wanted a better camera than the present one he had.  The above quote, or perhaps paraphrase, is from the employee that he was talking to. Obviously, this employee has never mounted his camera on a tripod before, and if he has, it certainly wasn&#8217;t the least bit breezy outside! <img src='http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><strong>A helping hand</strong><br />
So I thought, why not offer a running series of posts just for the Newbies?  While I was walking Hobbs this morning, I thought about some topics that I think might be useful to the uninitiated:</p>
<ul>
<li>Deciding between point-and-shoot and DLSR</li>
<li>Choosing a DSLR camera:</li>
<li>Choosing a point-and-shoot camera:</li>
<li>Extended warranty. Should I get one?</li>
<li>Tripod: Do I need one?  How to choose one</li>
<li>Pixels! Pixels! Pixels! &#8211; Explaining and showing the difference between different cameras/megapixels</li>
<li>What type of lenses do I need?</li>
<li>Accessories: What do I need? How many CF cards? Filters?</li>
</ul>
<p>OK, now that I&#8217;ve chosen one, how do I use it?  What are all of these strange markings on the camera?</p>
<ul>
<li>RAW? JPG?  What should I use? (Uh oh!).  That ought to be a fun one!</li>
<li>Aperture</li>
<li>Shutter Speed</li>
<li>Exposure</li>
<li>Manual mode</li>
<li>Composition</li>
</ul>
<p>So, those are the items that popped into my head immediately.  That&#8217;s a lot of information that needs to be disseminated.  Sure, you can find it all over web, so why not here, too.  I rather like the community here. <img src='http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   There are lots of experienced folks around here and I&#8217;m sure that they can add value to any article that I post, so after a post has cooled down, I&#8217;ll make changes to the post and promote it to a &#8216;page&#8217;.</p>
<p>Looks like I have a lot of work to do!  If you are a Newbie, or an experienced person and can think of anything else that might be helpful to a beginner, please chime in!  If you have any suggestions, let&#8217;s hear &#8216;em!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paullesterphoto.com/wordpress/2008/06/22/something-for-the-newbies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

