I’ve been thinking about this off and on, particularly when I look at the demise of my D2x as it sits, seemingly discarded, in one corner of the room. It rarely sees any use; however, it is still quite a capable camera.

I know that quite a few of you will be able to chime in on this. It’s a curiosity of mine. When you buy new photographic equipment, specifically a new camera body, what do you do with the old stuff?

I now have three Nikon camera bodies. From newest to oldest: D300, D40, D2x. The D2x was my first Nikon digital camera. What can I say? I wanted the best!

I use the D300 constantly, much the same way as I used the D2x. The D40 is my carry around camera that I use when I don’t want to use a tripod or am going for a photo walk, so to speak. Of the 3 cameras, two are nearly identical. The D2x and the D300. The D40 does not compare in any way to the other two, other than it produces photographs too. However, it is not meant to be a competitor.

Former glory
The D2x, used to be my go-to guy. It is still capable in every way. As a matter of fact, all of the pictures that I am using for my 2009 calendar were taken with the D2x! This was a surprise. I looked at the meta data after the fact. I kept the D2x mounted on the tripod and kept the D300 for close up, near-ground macro and walking around. There was a practical reason. I didn’t have a Really Right Stuff bracket for the D300 and didn’t want to spend an additional $200 to get one at the time.

So, what’s the difference?
As far as I’m concerned, the only differences that matter to me (sometimes) are:

1. The sensor cleaner. A big plus!
2. The D300′s better performance at higher ISO levels.
3. The D300′s auto focus is a bit better and more up-to-date, but for the way that I use the camera, I get the same out of each one, so the other differences don’t matter.
4. For shooting sports, they are equal. Both shoot at about 6 frames per second. Both of capable of shooting 8 frames per second, except the D2x has to do it cropped mode. The D300 needs a grip and either 8 AA batteries, or an En-El4a battery. But you can get a burst of 8 frames without the grip.

As you can see, the differences, from my point of view and usage, are small. I do feel that the D2x is more of a rugged, professional type camera than the D300. It just seems a bit more durable. I don’t hesitate to take it out in dust, light rain, fog, any type of weather. I’m a bit more hesitant with the D300. So, I was thinking that it would be my backup/tough(er) weather guy. I don’t want to sell, really, because I think that it does make an excellent starter or 6th man, to use basketball terms. I think that I’ll have to pick it up and use it some this weekend.

Naturally, both of these photos were taken with the D2x. According to the meta data, the last shot that I took with the D2x was May 29th of this year. I think that it’s time for it to come out of retirement!

OK, so let’s hear it. I know that a number of you bought new cameras this year: Earl? Mark? Laurie? Kate? Gordon? Anita? JH? Amy? So, I know that I’m not alone! Speak on it!