compare_small.jpg
Click for something much bigger!

Let’s start this thing right. This is NOT a professional paper review. As a matter of fact, this is so unprofessional that one might say, and could be quite accurate, that the guy who is doing this review was pretty clueless during the process and didn’t know WTF he was doing most of the time! :-) That said, take this for what is worth.

On Sunday when I returned from Charlotte, I had a box of Red River paper waiting for me; however, I didn’t touch it until last night. I wanted to make sure that I was rested and had time to play with it. After innumerable false starts, trips to web pages to find out this and that about printing, such as: Now how did I get to the Advanced Black & White printing via Lightroom or Photoshop???

Printing, my friends, is an art. There have been many a book written about printing and I have read exactly zero of them! I’m just trying to warn you. Don’t say that I didn’t tell you. I do miss the simplicity of my HP printer that didn’t have color profiles, etc. It was simple an produced glorious black and white prints with only 4 inks.

OK. After much fumbling about, I was able to produce about 5 prints on 5 different pieces of paper. I’ve included 3 of them here:

  • Aurora Natural
  • Aurora White
  • Ultrapro Gloss 2.0

Heretofore, I’ve only used Epson’s Ultra Premium Photo Paper Luster. I’ve been quite pleased with it, but it is a bit expensive. You save quite a bit of money by using the Red River equivalent, Ultrapro Satin 2.0. At the 8.5 x 11, 50 sheet pack, they cost almost the same. You save only about $5.00, but that is as close as they ever get. I buy 13 x 19 paper. 50 sheets of Ultrapro costs $52.95, the same in Epson, from B&H costs $87.94!

Whiter, brighter
I’ve read stuff about papers with optical brighteners, etc. And, just like anything else, there are many factions. Some won’t use paper with brighteners, some will, etc. If you click on the image at the top, I’ve left it fairly large. The first two images from the left are the Aurora Natural and Aurora White. Looking at them in person, it is quite obvious which one has the brighter whites, the Aurora White. However, the Aurora Natural has those nice, creamy white tones that I remember from using cotton rag paper. This would be a fantastic paper, I think for portraits, or perhaps still life shots. Heck, I even like it for landscapes. With the snow in the photo, you can really tell the difference. The blacks are not as deep as this is a matte paper.

I like deep blacks, but not fingerprints!
To the far right is the Ultrapro Gloss 2.0. I really like glossy papers, but usually use luster papers because of fingerprints. They just show up too readily on glossy prints. I love the bright whites and deep blacks of glossy papers. They make photos have a nice punch to them. I prefer many of my photos to be of medium contrast and this type of paper is perfect for it.

I tried, also, the aforementioned Ultrapro Satin and it is very similar to the Epson luster type paper except, to me, it has just a little finer texture on the surface.

I gave the River Linen a try and really like the feel and texture of the paper; however, I used only one of the sheets because I feel that this paper needs a special subject but I’m not sure what that is.

Overall, it was a fun experiment and I have plenty of paper remaining to print. I might even print a couple of color prints to compare. Though this year’s haul of color photos is somewhat lacking so far. I’ve been concentrating on B&W, which is where my heart is right now.

One big thing that I did learn: thou shalt not change black ink types midstream. It takes a long time for the printer to switch from matte black to photo black inks. Stick with the program. Make a test of matte papers, then make a test of regular papers. Don’t switch back and forth. It’s expensive! They have done a great job at minimizing ink loss in the Epson 3800, but there is still some as it clears those hoses of the ‘other’ ink!

So, I’ll probably buy some of the Aurora Natural, the Ultrapro Satin 2.0, and perhaps a bit of the Linen. I’ve liked them all, but I’m not going to have 18 different papers sitting around. That just leads to confusion and I don’t need any more confusion in my life!

 

PDL_20100211_012.jpg
Kodak Tech Pan 25 – Rodinal 1:300 – Mamiya 645e

Well, I finally followed through on my plan to bring my printer to Charleston. This past Sunday, I loaded it into the car and brought the beast with me.

Thanks to Ray Ketcham’s advice, I ordered a sample pack of paper from Red River Paper. According to UPS, it should be here today. Naturally, I want to get the paper and run a few sheets through this evening, but I doubt that I’ll be back to the apartment in time to get to the office, so it will have to wait until Sunday. I’ll pick the paper up from the office on Friday morning, drop it in the apartment, and go to work. :-( I leave directly from the office and go home on Friday evenings and return on Sunday evening. So, Sunday evening will probably be an evening for printing.

I have a number of shots, including the one with the post, that I want to print. I’ve not used any ‘fancy’ papers and so I’m looking forward to see what these new papers will look like and how the prints will differ. The sample pack has 36 sheets of paper, two, 8.5 x 11 inches, of each of the following AND it costs only $7.95!:

Resin Coated Photo-Feel Papers

66lb. Arctic Polar Gloss
66lb. Arctic Polar Satin
75lb. Arctic Polar Luster
66lb. Premium Polar Satin Warm Tone
68lb. UltraPro Gloss
68lb. UltraPro Satin 2.0

Matte Photo Papers
60lb. Polar Matte
47lb. Premium Matte
60lb. Premium Matte

50lb. Premium Matte Double Sided
60lb. Premium Matte Double Sided

Watercolor 100% Cotton Papers
Aurora Fine Art White
Aurora Fine Art Natural

Other
45lb. Zeppelin SemiGloss 2-sided
65lb. Premium Gloss Duo

Specialty
62lb. GreenPix Recycled
62lb. River Linen

60lb. Cordovan Textured Gloss
60lb. Paper Canvas

All sorts of finishes and weights. Some with optical brightener, others without. I’ve never seen them side-by-side. It’s going to be fun just trying to guess what type of photo works well on which type of paper. Watercolor? Fine Art? So many choices.

The nice thing about it is that should I find some that I like, and I’m sure that I will, their prices are by far the least expensive that I’ve seen and they get rave reviews about their customer service and their papers. There seems to be no downside whatsoever.

 

PDL_20100208_002.jpg

Kodak Tech Pan 25 – Mamyia 645e – Rodinal 1:300

Every morning on the way to work, pass a framing shop, I’ve Been Framed. They have a sign outside that they change weekly, offering different specials on framing. Almost without fail, after reading the sign, I think: I need to bring my printer Charleston so that I can do some prints and hang them on the wall. Yet, each time that I go back for the weekend, I don’t do it.

It’s not a matter of forgetting, because I do usually remember. Every Sunday, I look at that printer and wonder why I don’t bring it. I could say that I don’t have a place to put it, but I could by a stand. :-) At one point, a couple of years ago, I got into printing and was printing several times a week. Then, I stopped. Now I feel the desire to fire up that printer again.

The walls in my apartment are bare and I always think that somehow that is wrong. After all, I have so many photos that I could place on the wall and make it feel more cozy.

Previously all of the photos that I printed were done using Epson Premium Luster photo paper, which I like a lot. However, this time, I think that I want to find a paper, or perhaps several papers that are closer to the rag paper that I used to use in the darkroom when I felt that a particular photo needed that nice, creamy look or a feel different than I could get using the resin coated polycontrast papers that I normally used.

I know that there are a plethora of sample packs out there and would love some suggestions of papers to try.

The above photo is one that I really want to print.

 

pdl_20080301_5268.jpg
In a previous post . I wrote about selling photos online and about a few of the places that I had taken a swing at their free trial. So, now it’s been slightly more than 30 days since that last post, all free trials are finished, and there isn’t a clear winner … yet.

I must say that two of the services were very responsive, indeed
SmugMug:
The first was SmugMug. Not only do that have extensive online information, forums, and help, they are very quick to answer any question that you have via e-mail and they answer it quickly. The cost: $149/year + 15%. See the previous post for the write up.
ImageQuix:
The other, which was suggested by P.J., was ImageQuix. Here, you get your own personal account manager who will actually call you and talk to you on the phone. ImageQuix’s fee schedule is a bit different from the others. Here, you buy upload credits. You can upload about 3,000 images for $12. When I saw this I thought that was a fantastic deal. No monthly fees and only charges for uploads, which seemed very reasonable. If you wish to have ImageQuix collect money for you and you use their lab (full service), there are additional fees. You pay 12% commission + 3% credit card fee. Nothing unusual here. This is right in line with SmugMug, which charges $150/year + 15%, so you’re still coming out a bit ahead. The downside to this is that if you use their service, they don’t do refunds. This struck me as odd, so I checked in with my representative. Here is the actual excerpt from the email:

Regarding your no refund policy, does this just have to do with
credit card processing, or full service processing? I’d like to think
that if my customers don’t like the prints, due to the way the lab
printed them, that they could get a refund, or at a minimum, reprints so
that they are satisfied.

Ans. The refunding process is final for full service and credit card processing.

Well, I guess that I did read it right! There is the option of doing self-fulfillment. If you do so, by providing a link to PayPal, there are no commissions and the only fee that you pay is 3%, to PayPal, if someone is using a credit card; however, you will have to print, proof, and mail your own order.

Although I loved SmugMug, I’m not at the point where I can justify spending $150/year to sell a few pictures. Perhaps when I start selling more, that will be an option. I like the easy customization provided by SmugMug as well as their fantastically responsive customer service.

PhotoReflect:
Oh, speaking of customer service, before I said that I sent a request to PhotoReflect, but never got a response. Well, that’s not true any more, some 22 days after I sent the request, I got a response!!! Now, how’s that for customer service!!! Yeah!

So, as it is nearly basketball season AGAIN (does it ever end?) and I’ve got prints to sell, I think that I’ll go with ImageQuix and the self-fulfillment option. If the load gets too heavy, I’ll have to figure out something else.

© 2011 Paul Lester Photo Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Bad Behavior has blocked 409 access attempts in the last 7 days.